ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 16/10/2026Not to get too technical here, but this dissent is some of the most wacko shit I've ever read 010 1
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 15/10/2026These menu issue polls always tend towards the moderate option anyway. Even there I don't think SCOTUS expansion is polling too badly lol 020 2
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 15/10/2026If that's all they had the MJ should have refused to sign the warrant. Her asking that the bio info be corrected to the same birthdate on her form is not PC even for the notion that the former date was her true birthdate, much less that she was continuing a conspiracy initiated with her father 110 1
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 15/10/2026Best thing I could think of is an unreliable lying affiant: "I went to high school with Omar and we celebrated her 18th birthday x year" or whatever 100 1
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 15/10/2026I just don't understand what it could say they found under these facts. You'd need some proof she was born in 1981 or earlier in order to get PC in the first place 210 2
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 15/10/2026They do but gop congresspeople need to be the ones to even try and there is no chance they have the morale or the stones 1100 10
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 14/10/2026Yeah that's bc he's going to run for VP lol 000 0
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 14/10/2026Law and Order PD from 1993: "An ongoing conspiracy where the coconspirator is dead and my client was 12, get real Stone" 180 8
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 14/10/2026To be sure I do not think this is a *good* reason to model an R favoring electorate at the moment 060 6
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 14/10/2026I think the reasoning is simpler than that - they just don't believe the RV numbers they're getting (which could be a good faith belief tbc), and they've been burned too many times to not do an R friendly model 2120 12
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 11/10/2026Nationalism is antithetical to christianity, the people who call themselves christian nationalists are not true christians 020 2
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 09/10/2026HP as written was aggressively anti-fascist and pretty observant re how different people act when faced with those ideas. It's part of what makes the author's turn as goebbels on trans people so fucked up 1170 17
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 06/10/2026Look it feels inappropriate to say but this solves a lot of problems 0320 32
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 29/09/2026It also works because we actually want the policy behind the rhetoric lol 031 3
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 23/09/2026Have a half baked thought that the existence of bi men and trans women push on the same bigotry button for some people in a way that gay men maybe used to but don't anymore? 052 5
Reposted by @ceroespada.bsky.socialjamelle @jamellebouie.net · 22/09/2026again, i am begging people to actually look at the circumstances where this stuff is successful versus getting caught up in the fantasies they have generated in their minds 1231515 315
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 22/09/2026You have no idea how often I've had to make this point to people in real life 020 2
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 18/09/2026This is not happening but it is very funny 000 0
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 18/09/2026And that's assuming the more cabined US definition of recklessness; in the intl context it might very well be negligence-plus or whatever 020 2
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 18/09/2026Yeah assuming the lack of process before this planned strike this is very classic "willful blindness" recklessness 130 3
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 14/09/2026Everyone is hysterically depressed about America's future since everyone moved on to quasi live on the internet after covid 1382 38
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 13/09/2026Dallas delenda est might be the conclusion here 030 3
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 11/09/2026I've encountered very few liberals like that in real life, even self professed moderates 0122 12
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 10/09/2026This is actually a rare good headline imo 000 0
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 10/09/2026Also although he's an ass I haven't seen him be happy about SCOTUS crap, he very well might be capable of it but itd be an escalation of his behavior to confirm Rao or whatever 000 0
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 10/09/2026I personally do not think there's a good chance of that happening, and even if it did I think we *must* go to 13 seats regardless for safety 110 1
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 09/09/2026Look if the possible tenure of any member of the GOP SCOTUS majority is relevant at all after Jan 29 then we have bigger problems. We need a pro-court/structural reform trifecta in 29 and that's the one thing this asshole will have no influence over 100 1
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 04/09/2026This will affect almost nothing, we have enough money to contest the airwaves (mostly from individual cabdidate accounts in our case) and the advantage they'd get from advertising even 2 to 1 against us is capped in this day and age. All other signs point to the GOP getting crushed 100 1
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 01/09/2026I don't remember if it's this passage on the wall exactly but reading the excerpt of the second inaugural that's inside the Lincoln memorial is an experience 2190 19
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 01/09/2026Actually I think the TRO let's them do that? Or maybe just the latest TRO but I'm pretty sure there was a section saying they can keep building the system but they can't implement it, require anything of states, etc 000 0
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 01/09/2026I mean they could always change course if they want, people can make different choices. but they also consciously decided to be the first salvo in the effort to destroy liberal democracy in America so it would take a lot for them to make up that debt 000 0
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 01/09/2026If it makes you feel better our alma mater has been at least aspirationally bad forever, although it is in actual fact evil at the moment 110 1
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 01/09/2026No but that's my point, most people do not need to experience "consequences" in order to not behave in this kind of an anti-social fashion. It's not consequences that keep most people in line in a free society, it's the notion that your and everyone's life would be better off if you behaved 1130 13
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 01/09/2026This is also why I think conservatives are so gung-ho on not only harsh but disproportionate penalties--they think it's the only thing that works because it's the only thing that would deter *them* from being an asshole 319713 197
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 01/09/2026liberals generally resist naked deterrence as a justification for actions because 1. it's usually wrong, and 2. most people are smart enough to be deterred without being physically threatened. The problem is the republican coalition is now "those not smart enough to have enlightened self-interest" 524926 249
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 01/09/2026People who are ostensibly not happy with the current admin should not talk like this, it helps no one and it's almost never true 040 4
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 31/08/2026It's not about what's owed or not owed we just don't want the courts making people do certain things against their will regardless of the agreements they've entered into. Yes that makes surrogacy contracts less enforceable than other kinds but there are good reasons for that! 050 5
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 31/08/2026I disagree with it but that's been the way it's been for a long time and even the GOP govs respected it. Whether I predict that a future GOP gov would do so going fw is a whole nother story 000 0
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 31/08/2026This entire thread is wild. I think I had this hypo as a *multiple choice* bar exam question--you can't make the surrogate abort OR keep the child. 13A is the very last thing you want to whistle past 160 6
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 31/08/2026I figured he was just a conservadem. Not that that's his biggest sin but that should've DQd him from any Biden WH role outright 000 0
ceroespada.bsky.social @ceroespada.bsky.social · 31/08/2026Also is McGurk really such a fuckass to actually be pro-Trump now 160 6
