Sign in

Cath Haddon

@cathhaddon.bsky.social
13K followers 858 following 709 posts

Senior Fellow @instituteforgov.bsky.social + history, Whitehall geekiness and constitutional agony aunt Subscribe to our newsletter: bit.ly/3dxiJ5J

PostsRepliesMedia
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
We also found that ministerial attitudes to legal risk were v variable. It can change minister to minister. For inexperienced mins, hearing words like 'high risk' can be v worrisome. Others know it comes with territory and happy to press ahead.
Not everyone in the government has the same legal risk appetite. There are differences between officials, departments and ministers. We were told that departments’ failure to communicate with one another about legal risk appetite can be a source of frustration.
Ministers’ background and experience have a strong influence on their risk appetite.
Some junior ministers, having less experience than secretaries of state, have “no palpable sense of what high legal risk means” in policy and political terms. For some, this means that they “get scared” and show low risk appetite. One former official described the range of responses: some ministers “would take what lawyers say as gospel”, others would be engaged and prepared to ask questions and test the advice, but the most difficult were those who “totally refused to accept the fundamentals on which officials and lawyers were giving advice”, leading to the problem of finding the right language to explain to them why they could not break the law
100
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
Depts are v variable in how they respond to legal risk. For some depts it is daily, for others v rare. But even then, the nature of the policy can mean different approaches.
In Defra, which has had 40 years of operating with a bedrock of EU legislation, “no one moves without talking to their lawyers”; the law is seen as “totemic” and that can influence how “risky” any course of action is perceived to be. However, in the Home Office, risk appetite is higher, at least where the minister’s political objective is a ‘crackdown’ approach to enforcement. As an official said: “If the government takes an aggressive position on deporting people (for example) it is going to encounter these problems. It is for the government to choose if they want to magnify these problems.”
In fact, judicial review is sometimes considered a political tool in itself. More than one interviewee told us that with certain Home Office decisions, politicians would find it more politically palatable to be forced to abandon a policy or action by a court than to abandon it themselves.
100
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
Or maybe they are largely the same. But, as we no longer have a CSPM, let's see which ones CDL/ 1st Secretary chairs. Also to see how the taskforces fit alongside them. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/ca...
120
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
Purnell's final advice reads like an obit to the Starmer govt as well as advice to Burnham. The full paper is here. Also worth a read for any aspiring ministers... www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/defaul...
By the end of your first 100 days, the public, the Opposition and the media should understand what you are trying to do with your department. You should have provided a frame through which they interpret its activities. If you don’t provide such a frame, someone else will and it will not be the one you want
051
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 22/06/2026
If a leadership contest is triggered by a challenger they only need 81 MPs. If Labour leadership contest is triggered by PM announcing he is stepping down, then to be nominated you need those 81 MPs AND affiliated trade unions or 5% of constituency parties.
140
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 14/05/2026
UK government
0101
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
Yet another reason why someone really needs to update the Cabinet Manual (since it still relies on FTPA), but this is relevant. A confidence motion, such as voting down the King's Speech, is saying that the government cannot command confidence and must leave office.
131
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
What happens if govt is defeated? My view is KS is a confidence vote/ would lead to confidence vote. This is what happened in Jan 1924. Impt to note, this is confidence in 'THE GOVERNMENT' not the PM. It's not a mechanism to change PM, but to change party of government or trigger an election.
3135
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
Said it in 2023, saying it again now
49229
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 10/02/2026
This from The Times newsletter is also.. not right. As Cabinet Manual sets out, PM appts on basis of advice from outgoing Cab Sec and 1st CS Commissioner. PM is not at all dependent on those previously shortlisted. And can make a direct appt with minimal process (if that person is appropriate)
Extract from The Times newsletter: The prime minister wants to appoint someone immediately to the job to avoid a power vacuum at the heart of government. This means only those shortlisted for the job when Wormald was appointed in December 2024 will be eligible. One of the candidates has left the civil service, while another was also involved in vetting Mandelson. By process of elimination, this puts Dame Antonia Romeo in pole position to become Britain’s first ever female cabinet secretary. Extract from the Cabinet Manual: The Cabinet Secretary is the head of the
Cabinet Secretariat. The Cabinet Secretary
is appointed by the Prime Minister on the
advice of the retiring Cabinet Secretary and
the First Civil Service Commissioner.
11712
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 10/02/2026
Seeing as I’m on a roll I will explain the rules here. There isn’t necessarily a standard appointment process. Recent ones have seen applications and interviews overseen by CS Commission. But have also seen people directly appointed with minimal process.
121
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 09/02/2026
Cabinet secretaries A 110 year old job. A lot of variation in how past holders have done the job. A lot of debate about whether the job is even doable now. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/ca...
4346
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 20/01/2026
Jones says that to achieve the changes he wants to see in public services it may require more fundamental changes to the civil service in the future. But for now he wants the CS to ‘move fast and fix things’ www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/event/modern...
121
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 13/01/2026
Wes Streeting kicking off our conference “Our fortunes are in our hands”. Says government needs to take control of turning around the pessimism about government.
044
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 01/01/2026
Giles, your discovery of Bleak House has been one of my joys this Christmas (I’ve been rewatching the excellent BBC series) But…. does this mean you’ve yet to discover Little Dorrit and the Circumlocution Office?
140
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
pick-and-mix, sugar tax, overly sweet dairy drinks.... and now lollipops... Every budget seems to have a different food related theme and this one seems to have found its own contribution www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/live-blog/au...
IfG senior fellow Jill Rutter is a former Treasury civil servant. On the BBC podcast The Tax Conundrum she describes how the Treasury would look for positive stories to sweeten the bitter pill of tax rises:

"When I was in my very early days at the Treasury, and chancellors were making some quite unpleasant decisions in budgets, we used to spend the last few weeks ahead of the budget in what was called a lollipop hunt. 

The idea was that the chancellor wanted to leaven the bad news with some lollipops that were tweaks to the tax system or maybe a bit of money for something that you could point to and you would get… [something like] "the association of duck farmers welcome the chancellor’s final recognition that they need this relief".

The problem is that after you've brought in that relief, you've got a built-in lobby group that will squeal the moment you decide you need to take it away because either it’s costing more than you thought or it’s not having the effects you wanted."
020
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 17/11/2025
But despite the onboarding challenges (there were few a smh in room), Rachel reminds us that fast stream is highly rated in private sector as a graduate scheme. Other employers want fast streamers. Now discussing how to retain fast streamers to G7. Especially given pay and cost of living in london
130
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 11/09/2025
Liz Lloyd gets THREE jobs as well as a peerage. We were used to joint ministers, and a lot more of them this time, but is this a first? She is a Parly Under-Secretary in DSIT and DBT and a whip.
272
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 05/09/2025
Reflections from @drhannahwhite.bsky.social on our liveblog: Reshuffles crafted in haste can sometimes lead to mistakes repented st length. This is a critical moment for the PM and a test of how they are thinking about ministerial performance. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/live-blog/st...
124
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 05/09/2025
Includes our classic ministerial resignations chart Starmer’s first major reshuffle but been a fair few departures already
041
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 05/09/2025
This feels like a very targeted comment
0162
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 05/09/2025
Our event at Reform U.K. starting with @akashpaun.bsky.social talking about the “messy” system of local government currently in the U.K. 14 mayors covering about 50% of U.K. the two or three tiers of loval govt made more confusing by other functions that don’t match to political boundaries.
2146
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 15/07/2025
It’s double event day at IfG. Now talking special adviser and the challenges Labour spads have faced. Salma Shah says that it’s an art, and part of that is working around the system. Which is why can be challenging for officials whose system is based around rules and hierarchy.
142
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 15/07/2025
Photo doesn’t do justice to @stephenkb.bsky.social’s excellent suit. Discussing one year in to Starmer govt, how is it going and how are missions doing in particular. Watch live www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/event/labour...
2122
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 17/05/2025
Ah, sorry. Realised my mistake
050
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
133 Cardinals misspelling each others names “Who told you about the shield Freddie?” Freddie: “the bad guy bloke from potter” Claudia blinks slowly in Latin
3132
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 13/03/2025
Further thought from today's announcement and @stuarthoddinott.bsky.social prophetic blog, the abolition of NHSE very much changes the role of Perm Sec DHSC Process is already underway, but I wonder how they are thinking about role, skills and experience needed. @alexgathomas.bsky.social thoughts?
210
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 13/03/2025
Good time to reread @stuarthoddinott.bsky.social piece analysing the resignation of NHSE chief executive. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/aman...
0114
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 04/03/2025
Looking forward to this panel @ucl.ac.uk next Weds 5-7pm. 5 years since covid, what are the lessons for communicating in a crisis? Jonathan Van-Tam @profaliceroberts.bsky.social @susanmichie.bsky.social Professor Jack Stilgoe Dr Philip Ball and me! www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/communicat...
86321
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 19/01/2024
Comms director’s interpretation of giving me power:
160
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 19/01/2024
My version of how well this will go:
170
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 15/11/2023
Our reshuffle team have wrapped on the liveblog. Some more detailed analysis from @timdurrant.bsky.social and the team to come, but this is where the reshuffle left the ministerial ranks www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/article/live...
Chart showing remaining, new and departed ministers, 15 November 2023Chart showing changes in post across all government ministerial roles, 15 November 2023
031
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 30/10/2023
We tried to capture what this change meant in organisational terms at the time. This was around the time when the 'Tsars' were coming on board, and meanwhile the COBR machine links to devolveds was downgraded
151
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 23/10/2023
020
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 13/10/2023
And finally, from me, the overall mood. The horrors of the attacks in Israel were ever present. Elsewhere it was incredibly busy but also noticeably disciplined. The media may have been frustrated but Labour will probably take boring.
With the increased attendance of businesses, lobbyists, foreign diplomats and other external groups who turned up in droves, this was also a busy conference. The poll lead that Labour has built up was discussed, and acknowledged, but
'no complacency' was a line repeated more than
once. It was clear that Starmer's team wanted
to take nothing for granted and wanted the conference to be seen as boring - rather than exciting for the wrong reasons
021
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 13/10/2023
On standards, the Integrity and Ethics Commission does seem to have survived Rayner’s move.
Labour is still committed to the Ethics and
Integrity Commission that Rayner described in a speech at the Institute, and indeed the theme of tackling low standards and corruption was common across the conference, with shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves announcing a Covid-
19 corruption commission. Details, however, are thin on the ground - exactly who would sit on either of these commissions, what their legal base will be and how they will work with other existing bits of government remains to be seen.
It is clear, though, that despite Rayner's move, Labour still see integrity and ethics as a way to differentiate themselves from the
Conservatives, and therefore as a key plank of their pitch to voters
110
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 13/10/2023
Brexit got little attention. @jillongovt.bsky.social says that the thrust of the message was that Labour would make it work better
Rachel Reeves said that "Brexit, without a plan" was one example of the mayhem caused by Conservative governments. Keir Starmer also allowed one mention of Brexit into his
conference speech - in his litany of
Conservative delusion misleading voters, his most substantive point was when he declared:
"When they told you - to your face - that Brexit would only bring benefits to your business." In other words, this is not to say that Brexit was wrong but that this Brexit is not working - and that a Labour government could and would make it work better.
110
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 13/10/2023
On levelling up, Rayner has only been in the job a few weeks. But one thing that has emerged is Labour’s plan for a Take Back Control bill and plans for local areas to bid for powers
One area where Labour's plans are clearer is
English devolution. Paula Barker, the shadow minister for devolution and the English regions, spoke about the Take Back Control Bill -
legislation to underpin further devolution at the start of a Labour government - at another of our fringe events. And detail released from the National Policy Forum said that a Labour
government would give places a formal right to request powers devolved elsewhere, in line with recommendations from Institute for
Government research. Further work is required to set out how a Labour government would deliver further devolution in practice, but it is welcome that progress made by the current
government over the past decade or so will be built upon and developed whichever party wins the next election
100
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 13/10/2023
On net zero it was clearer that Starmer and Miliband were happy to pick up the gauntlet that Sunak had thrown down, with, as Rosa Hodkin points out, a focus on the benefits of lower costs to consumer
Both Starmer and shadow net zero secretary Ed
Miliband seemed happy to take on Rishi Sunak's
weaponisation of net zero the week before, with Starmer arguing that "climate change is an opportunity we can't pass up" and insisting the UK should "speed ahead". Both rejected Sunak's
argument that moving more slowly on net zero
would save consumers money, arguing that energy bills had risen because of the failure to invest in clean energy
100
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 13/10/2023
Reflections from Labour conference. @emmanorris points out the lack of detail on what Labour would do differently has still not been met. Also covered this in the podcast, how pre-1997 there has been a lot more detailed policy work.
On public services we heard a lot about reform, but less about how Labour will achieve it
without raising investment. Opposition is not a place to work up every policy in minute detail.
But in 1997 - one of the victories Starmer
invoked - Labour benefited from detailed work
on clear policy pledges on the minimum wage, devolution and class sizes. Starmer and his party need to convince the electorate that a future Labour government would have the ideas and plans to deliver change. They are still some way short of achieving that, and will need to narrow the gap between Labour's pitch for power and the scale of policies currently on offer
162
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 10/10/2023
Strong message to the party about being ‘focused, disciplined’ ready for the fight with SNP and conservatives. “Britain can, Britain will, Britain must get its future back”
130
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 07/10/2023
This will keep us going, just look at each image v v v quickly
010
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 07/10/2023
110
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 07/10/2023
Actually think I might need a good movie choice
000
Cath Haddon @cathhaddon.bsky.social · 07/10/2023
Can’t seem to post gifs so here’s some cheese
140