Sign in

Cary Coglianese

@cary-coglianese.bsky.social
400 followers 246 following 38 posts

Edward B. Shils Professor of Law and Political Science; Director, Penn Program on Regulation, University of Pennsylvania. carycoglianese.net

PostsRepliesMedia
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 01/08/2026
The Penn Program on Regulation (PPR) is celebrating its 20th anniversary! The world of regulation has witnessed dramatic changes over this time—as has the world generally. Through it all, PPR has delivered vital analyses, dialogues, research, & learning. Our latest news: mailchi.mp/841e991edc20...
021 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
Looking forward to my online conversation next week with extraordinary colleagues, talking about the administrative state after the Supreme Court’s monumental decision this term in Trump v. Slaughter.
1106 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 29/06/2026
For years, agency independence had been on life support. Today, the Court pulled the plug.The Court did affirm that one agency can, to some degree, keep its formal legal independence: the Fed. But overall, the Court has green-lighted having government be based on presidential whim over expertise.
U.S. Supreme Court Building
111 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 02/06/2026
New AI executive order, signed today, that calls for a voluntary process that will "provide the Federal Government with access to covered frontier models ... for a period of up to 30 days before they plan to release such models to other trusted partners." www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
whitehouse.gov
Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1.  Purpose.
020 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 02/05/2026
Now on YouTube: a Penn-led conversation on Trump’s National Policy Framework for AI, with Ioanna Marinescu, Jennifer Rothman, Kevin Werbach, & Christopher Yoo. youtu.be/r6gNVIZ47d8 @imarinescu.bsky.social @kwerb.com @upenn.edu @theregreview.bsky.social @penncareylaw.bsky.social
youtu.be
Trump's AI Policy Framework
YouTube video by Penn Program on Regulation
042 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 27/04/2026
April’s Penn Program on Regulation newsletter is out, featuring faculty analysis on AI governance, privacy, affordability, antitrust, tax policy, women’s rights, and more, plus a recap of PPR’s “AI Month.” buff.ly/8kzocDd
buff.ly
Your Latest Regulatory Analysis from Penn
021 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 21/04/2026
I’m looking forward to discussing the Trump Administration’s recently released “National AI Policy Framework” with my @upenn.edu colleagues on Weds April 29 @ 4 pm ET. To sign up for this free webinar, go to www.law.upenn.edu/calendar/eve...
law.upenn.edu
Trump’s AI Policy Framework
In March, the White House released a “National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence,” calling upon Congress to enact a series of legisl...
001 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 05/04/2026
Recently honored to introduce Prof Dorothy Roberts, my esteemed colleague at @penncareylaw.bsky.social, as the 15th Annual Distinguished Lecturer on Regulation. Her remarks—drawing on her brilliant new memoir, The Mixed Marriage Project—revealed how law has long regulated families, not just markets.
Penn Carey Law Professor Dorothy Roberts delivering the 15th Annual Distinguished Lecture on Regulation at the University of Pennsylvania in 2026.
011 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School @penncareylaw.bsky.social · 31/03/2026
Prof. Cary Coglianese (@cary-coglianese.bsky.social) spotlights AI use in federal agency decision-making. In a new essay in @theregreview.bsky.social, he explains why current AI tools cannot replace the reasoned human judgment the law requires. Read more: penncareylaw.news/4dj8eQe
penncareylaw.news
AI, Expertise, and Administrative Law
Professor Cary Coglianese examines the limits of AI in federal agency decision-making.
012 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
The Regulatory Review @theregreview.bsky.social · 23/03/2026
"Agency officials need to be on their guard against over-reliance on untested and insufficiently thoughtful uses of AI," Professor Cary Coglianese, faculty advisor to The Regulatory Review, argues in a recent essay. www.theregreview.org/2026/03/23/c...
012 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 03/03/2026
In the latest podcast from @kleinmanenergy.bsky.social, my esteemed colleague, Shelley Welton, and I dig into the legal issues underlying EPA’s recent recission of its endangerment finding—and what it means for the future of US climate regulation. kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/commentary/p...
kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu
The Endangerment Finding and the Future of EPA’s Authority
Energy policy research from the University of Pennsylvania
021 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
The Warren Center for Network & Data Sciences @warrencenter.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
Two Warren Center affiliates were part of an advisory committee that created a roadmap for regulating AI in Pennsylvania. Cary Coglianese and Richard Berk spent over a year studying how other states are responding, assessing AI's role across major sectors. penntoday.upenn.edu/...
021 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 23/02/2026
Shout out to Heather Cox Richardson (@hcrichardson.bsky.social) for quoting from The Regulatory Review (@theregreview.bsky.social) in a recent Substack piece of hers. Hat tip to my valued colleague Eric Orts (@ericorts.bsky.social) for pointing me to this. open.substack.com/pub/heatherc...
open.substack.com
February 22, 2026
On February 6, four direct descendants of President Theodore Roosevelt wrote to United States senators to ask them to vote against a measure that opens up the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BW...
021 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School @penncareylaw.bsky.social · 21/02/2026
Prof. Cary Coglianese (@cary-coglianese.bsky.social) weighs in on the 6–3 SCOTUS ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, holding that the IEEPA does not authorize presidential tariffs — a decision he calls an important affirmation of the rule of law. penncareylaw.news/4rtSCNO
penncareylaw.news
Cary Coglianese on the Tariff Ruling and the Rule of Law
Cary Coglianese describes the Supreme Court’s decision as a clear affirmation of the rule of law. In his view, the ruling reflects the Court’s willing...
012 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 20/02/2026
The Supreme Court’s decision in the tariff case should be seen as a victory for the rule of law. www.law.upenn.edu/live/news/18...
law.upenn.edu
Cary Coglianese on the Tariff Ruling and the Rule of Law
Cary Coglianese describes the Supreme Court’s decision as a clear affirmation of the rule of law. In his view, the ruling reflects the Court’s willing...
021 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
The Warren Center for Network & Data Sciences @warrencenter.bsky.social · 07/02/2026
Congratulations to Warren Center faculty affiliate Cary Coglianese, who placed 19th in SSRN's 2025 author rankings by total new downloads, reflecting the global reach and influence of his scholarship. www.law.upenn.edu/li...
021 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
Longtail News @longtail-news.bsky.social · 09/02/2026
Feed: "The Regulatory Review" By: Cary Coglianese on Monday, February 9, 2026
theregreview.org
The Opposite of Smart Regulation
The federal government is moving backwards in its regulatory analysis and decision-making.
002 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
Bridget Dooling @bridgetdooling.bsky.social · 06/02/2026
Over at the Yale Journal on Regulation's blog, @j-p-a.bsky.social and I have put together a 🔥 symposium for you on the intersection of AI and administrative law. This symposium is for AI skeptics, AI believers, and everyone in between. Come join us! www.yalejreg.com/topic/sympos...
yalejreg.com
Symposium on AI and the APA Archives - Yale Journal on Regulation
12012 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
Jordan Ascher @j-p-a.bsky.social · 06/02/2026
Today in our AI & the APA symposium: @cary-coglianese.bsky.social discusses the place of those very confident-sounding chatbots in administrative decisionmaking. www.yalejreg.com/nc/ai-taxi-d...
yalejreg.com
AI, Taxi Drivers, and Administrative Law, by Cary Coglianese - Yale Journal on Regulation
Agencies will not be able to rely solely on today’s most ubiquitous forms of AI—namely, those based on ChatGPT and similar large language models—to avoid their obligation under the APA’s arbitrary and...
112 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 01/02/2026
Regulation is about relationships—between the people who regulate, are regulated, and third parties. Good regulators promote trustworthy, valuable relationships where all people are treated with dignity and respect. The latest from the Penn Program on Regulation: mailchi.mp/fe0b91c3fbbd...
mailchi.mp
Your Latest Regulatory Analysis from Penn
032 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
“[T]o sanction the brutal conduct ... before us, would be to afford brutality the cloak of law. Nothing would be more calculated to discredit law and thereby to brutalize the temper of a society.” - Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952)
020 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 21/01/2026
In Trump v. Cook, the Supreme Court considers the President's power to fire a Fed Governor. Recently, I talked with 9 heads of other independent agencies who’d been targeted for removal. They offered truly distinctive perspectives on the stakes in this legal battle. youtu.be/y6AuSuMr2eI?...
youtu.be
The Last of the Independents? President Trump’s Assertion of Power to Remove Federal Agency Leaders
YouTube video by Penn Program on Regulation
021 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
David Froomkin @dfroomkin.bsky.social · 29/12/2025
My new article with @cary-coglianese.bsky.social, titled "Loper Bright's Disingenuity," has been published in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review. We argue that, even as the Loper Bright decision claimed to overrule Chevron, it preserved Chevron's core. pennlawreview.com/2025/12/23/l...
Loper Bright prompted a tidal wave of reaction throughout the legal community when the Supreme Court announced it was overruling Chevron, the most frequently cited Court decision in administrative law. But Loper Bright cannot mean what it says. This article identifies three respects in which the majority opinion’s claim to have overruled Chevron distorts the real substance of the Court’s logic. First, we apply Loper Bright’s framework to the facts of Chevron and show that it would have produced the same outcome—if nothing else, an exceedingly curious result if Chevron were indeed overturned. Second, even as applied to other cases, the Loper Bright framework does not truly depart from the Chevron framework. Chevron’s premise was that Congress had delegated the authority to interpret an ambiguous statutory term in an agency’s enabling statute to the agency. Loper Bright may eschew the word “deference” but without changing the underlying analysis. We show that this kind of wordplay is of little value in making institutional decisions about the allocation of authority. Finally, the very craft of the Loper Bright opinion betrays the perils of the exercise that Loper Bright demands of reviewing courts. Loper Bright instructs judges to identify the “best reading” of administrative statutes, suggesting that an even-handed exercise in recovering semantic meaning can identify extant lines of authority in the administrative state. But the decision rests on an interpretation of the Administrative Procedure Act that is itself selective and slipshod. Ultimately, Loper Bright’s formalist rhetoric turns out to mask what is going on under the hood. When judges substitute their views of what is “best” for those of agencies, arguments about statutory meaning can quickly succumb to choices about policy. Avoiding such an outcome, of course, was one of Chevron’s core aims.
14921 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis @sbcasociety.bsky.social · 10/11/2025
Benefit-Cost Analysis and the Law SBCA Professional Development Workshop November 18 & 21, 2025 | 11:00 am-2:00 pm ET buff.ly/063ep8G Meet our presenter Cary Coglianese.
sbca.memberclicks.net
Benefit-Cost Analysis and the Law
162 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
The Warren Center for Network & Data Sciences @warrencenter.bsky.social · 03/11/2025
“If an AI system can make an improvement, if we can demonstrate and verify and validate that it's working better, then this is how we hold it accountable and what we should be aspiring for,” says Warren Center faculty affiliate Cary Coglianese.
wbur.org
The world has its first AI government official
Albania’s prime minister has installed a new minister. Only it isn’t human, it’s Artificial Intelligence. What does this signal for the evolution of government administration around the world?
041 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School @penncareylaw.bsky.social · 05/11/2025
This is a new era,” Prof. Cary Coglianese (@cary-coglianese.bsky.social) tells WBUR’s On Point, as AI use in gov’t grows from 150 to 3,000+ cases. “Humans design & use these systems — and they must remain accountable.” penncareylaw.news/4oTsNFj
penncareylaw.news
The world has its first AI government official
Albania’s prime minister has installed a new minister. Only it isn’t human, it’s Artificial Intelligence. What does this signal for the evolution of government administration around the world?
032 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School @penncareylaw.bsky.social · 03/11/2025
Reliable assurance that a project’s declared ton of carbon savings equates to a real ton of emissions removed…is crucial,” write Prof. Cary Coglianese (@cary-coglianese.bsky.social) & Cynthia Giles in Science, cited by MIT Tech Review. penncareylaw.news/4oskDUK
penncareylaw.news
What’s next for carbon removal?
Companies have still drawn down only enough CO2 to cancel out a few hours of US emissions. Here’s what it will take to really scale up the sector.
032 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School @penncareylaw.bsky.social · 30/10/2025
Prof. Cary Coglianese (@cary-coglianese.bsky.social) weighs in on the EPA’s proposed TSCA rule, warning that it could leave the agency “with less information...on which to base its decision-making about risk management of toxic chemicals.” Read via Newsweek: penncareylaw.news/4nzXQ8a
022 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School @penncareylaw.bsky.social · 16/10/2025
“As AI becomes part of daily life, public demand for its use in government will grow,” Prof. Cary Coglianese (@cary-coglianese.bsky.social) tells TIME. But transparency & oversight are essential. penncareylaw.news/3WcsgC7
penncareylaw.news
The First AI-Powered Minister Tests the Future of Government
An AI system named Diella has joined Albania’s cabinet, testing how far governments are willing to trust machines with power.
022 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 26/09/2025
Berger v. United States (1934): “The United States Attorney is the representative…of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all.” www.theregreview.org/2020/06/29/c...
theregreview.org
Politics, Prosecutors, and Procedural Fairness | The Regulatory Review
President Trump contravenes fundamental fairness by exerting political pressure over prosecutors.
041 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School @penncareylaw.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
Prof. Cary Coglianese (@cary-coglianese.bsky.social) shared insights on regulatory excellence with leaders from 18 Australian regulators, highlighting integrity, competence, and engagement as central to building public trust. Watch his interview & slides: penncareylaw.news/3IcrQbG
penncareylaw.news
Cary Coglianese on regulatory excellence
International expert Professor Cary Coglianese shares practical insights on how integrity, engagement and performance can shape better regulation.
012 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
Kleinman Center for Energy Policy @kleinmanenergy.bsky.social · 23/09/2025
PODCAST: Auditors promise integrity in carbon markets. New research suggests the reality is far more complicated. On Energy Policy Now, Cynthia Giles and Cary Coglianese explain why.
kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu
The Conflicted Role of Auditors in Carbon Markets - Kleinman Center for Energy Policy
Energy policy research from the University of Pennsylvania
022 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School @penncareylaw.bsky.social · 03/09/2025
Professor Cary Coglianese (@cary-coglianese.bsky.social) speaks with @bloomberglaw.com about a lawsuit recently filed in Maryland federal court by FreeState Justice that accuses the federal government of depriving transgender workers of protections and processes afforded to cisgender workers.
news.bloomberglaw.com
Equal Protection Fight Looms Over EEOC’s Transgender Bias Shift
The Trump EEOC’s retreat from transgender discrimination enforcement has set up an impending legal showdown over whether the agency is violating the constitutional rights of workers it’s tasked with p...
022 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
Regulation & Governance @reggovjournal.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
As we approach our 20th anniversary, we look back at an early contribution to Regulation & Governance, including this first editorial by the John Braithwaite, Cary Coglianese & David Levi-Faur that asked: 'Can regulation and governance make a difference?' onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Screenshot of the first paragraphs of first editorial in regulation & governance

Regulation and governance have become popular phenomena for social scientists to study and for good reason. Although redistributive, distributive and developmental policies still abound, the expanding part of governance is regulation. Indeed, few projects are more central to the social sciences than the study of regulation and regulatory governance. Regulation and the significant issues raised by it have become central to the work of social scientists from many disciplines – political science, economics, law, sociology, psychology, anthropology, history and others. Furthermore, the strong interest of other professional and scholarly communities, such as physicians, nutritionists, biologists, ecologists, geologists, pharmacists and chemists, makes regulatory issues even more central to scientists and practitioners who are perplexed by the demands for better, fairer, more efficient, and more participatory systems of governance.

We have established this journal to serve the needs of these varied professional and scholarly communities. We aim to provide a leading interdisciplinary platform for the study of regulation and its implications for governance. We seek to bridge and solidify discussions among a variety of relevant disciplines, serving the development of core theoretical and empirical insights in the study of regulation.

In this editorial introduction, we introduce the new journal first by offering an avowedly brief history of how interest in regulation has grown across the social science disciplines in the course of the last century. We then argue that the most recent buildup of that wave of research interest has coincided with a shift in political studies from an interest in government to governance. Finally, we distinguish regulation from governance and set out broadly, yet clearly, the intellectual agenda and vision for Regulation & Governance.
062 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
The Warren Center for Network & Data Sciences @warrencenter.bsky.social · 25/08/2025
After the Supreme Court tamps down on nationwide injunctions, future pathways and questions still remain. Warren Center faculty affiliate Cary Coglianese writes about "Judicial Remedies After CASA." www.theregreview.org/2025/08/11/c...
theregreview.org
Judicial Remedies After CASA | The Regulatory Review
After the Supreme Court tamps down on nationwide injunctions, future pathways and questions still remain.
021 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
The Regulatory Review @theregreview.bsky.social · 21/08/2025
In a recent essay, Cary Coglianese of Penn Carey Law contends that effective regulation demands ongoing vigilance and responsiveness rather than reliance on written codes alone. www.theregreview.org/2025/08/19/m...
012 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School @penncareylaw.bsky.social · 20/08/2025
In an op-ed for The Regulatory Review, coauthored by Matthew Lee Wiener, Professor Cary Coglianese examines the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v CASA eliminating nationwide injunctions, and he explores the legal questions and pathways that remain for litigants challenging national policies.
theregreview.org
Judicial Remedies After CASA | The Regulatory Review
After the Supreme Court tamps down on nationwide injunctions, future pathways and questions still remain.
022 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
The Regulatory Review @theregreview.bsky.social · 19/08/2025
In a recent essay, Cary Coglianese of the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School argues that regulation must be understood as a verb—an ongoing process of vigilance and adaptation—rather than a static set of written rules. www.theregreview.org/2025/08/19/m...
053 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
The Warren Center for Network & Data Sciences @warrencenter.bsky.social · 08/08/2025
In this interview with the ANZSOG, Warren Center affiliate Cary Coglianese discusses challenges ahead for regulators, the threats and opportunities of AI, building/maintaining trust, and the value of bringing regulators from different sectors together. anzsog.edu.au/news/h...
021 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
Laurie Adkin, Ph.D. @laurieadkin.bsky.social · 14/08/2025
Coglianese, Cary and Giles, Cynthia, Third-Party Auditing Cannot Guarantee Carbon Offset Credibility (June 15, 2025). U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 25-28, Available at SSRN: ssrn.com/abstract=534... or dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn...
ssrn.com
Third-Party Auditing Cannot Guarantee Carbon Offset Credibility
Many entities are pushing for carbon offsets to be part of the solution to climate change. The argument is that allowing organizations to pay others to reduce c
021 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
Dan Deacon @dtdeacon.bsky.social · 15/08/2025
Over at the Notice and Comment blog, today's Ad Law Reading Room entry is "Loper Bright's Disingenuity," by @cary-coglianese.bsky.social and @dfroomkin.bsky.social. Check it out! www.yalejreg.com/nc/ad-law-re...
yalejreg.com
Ad Law Reading Room: "Loper Bright's Disingenuity," by Coglianese and Froomkin - Yale Journal on Regulation
Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Loper Bright’s Disingenuity,” by Cary Coglianese and David Froomkin. Here is the abstract: Loper Bright prompted a tidal wave of reaction throughout the legal com...
01910 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
As The Regulatory Review wraps up its series on the Supreme Court’s latest term, my colleague, Matt Wiener, and I analyze one of the most significant decisions of the year: Trump v. CASA, which closed the door on federal courts’ use of national injunctions. www.theregreview.org/2025/08/11/c...
theregreview.org
Judicial Remedies After CASA | The Regulatory Review
After the Supreme Court tamps down on nationwide injunctions, future pathways and questions still remain.
121 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 09/08/2025
𝘕𝘦𝘸: “𝐎𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐃𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐑𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬.” Explores the need for digital regulators in two senses: Regulators "of" digital technologies, and regulators in all domains that work "with" the aid of digital technologies. Also, note the plural: "regulators." papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com
On the Need for Digital Regulators
<p><span>The growing digital economy brings increasing recognition of the need for digital regulators. This chapter considers two senses of the term “digital re
111 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
The Warren Center for Network & Data Sciences @warrencenter.bsky.social · 05/08/2025
In a new editorial published in Science, Warren Center faculty affiliate Cary Coglianese and co-author Cynthia Giles raise critical concerns about the ability of third-party auditing to restore the credibility of carbon offset markets. www.law.upenn.edu/li...
law.upenn.edu
Rethinking Carbon Offset Audits
Penn Carey Law’s Cary Coglianese co-authors Science editorial exposing systemic flaws in offset verification.
021 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 02/08/2025
𝘕𝘦𝘸: 𝐄𝐔 𝐀𝐈 𝐀𝐜𝐭'𝐬 𝐈𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐏𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐔𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐈 “Will AI systems take over governmental decision-making from elected officials? ... Will people in the future live under the rule of robotic overlords?” Questions from my foreword to a new book on the EU AI Act. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com
EU AI Act's Impact on Public Sector Use of AI
As the rapid proliferation of innovation in artificial intelligence (AI) transforms major business sectors throughout the global economy, AI is also changing th
242 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
David Froomkin @dfroomkin.bsky.social · 01/08/2025
This is an excellent interview with my coauthor @cary-coglianese.bsky.social, where he talks among other things about our new paper on Loper Bright. Cary explains very clearly why we question the Court's claim to have overruled Chevron. Our paper is posted here: papers.ssrn.com/abstract=537...
ballardspahr.com
Loper Bright Enterprises One Year Later: The Practical Impact on Business, Consumers, and Federal Agencies | Blogs | Insights | Ballard Spahr
043 0
Cary Coglianese @cary-coglianese.bsky.social · 02/08/2025
All agencies need a degree of autonomy to operate in a manner that advances public welfare--and autonomy matters crucially for those agencies whose mission is to gather evidence and report data, whether or not those agencies are formally independent as a legal matter. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com
The Semi-Autonomous Administrative State
Conflicting views about presidential control of the administrative state have too long been characterized in terms of a debate over agency independence. But the
192 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
David Froomkin @dfroomkin.bsky.social · 30/07/2025
Loper Bright's Disingenuity, with @cary-coglianese.bsky.social, is forthcoming in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review. We argue that the majority opinion in Loper Bright is empty and internally contradictory. It is an assertion of power rather than reason. papers.ssrn.com/abstract=537...
13515 0
Reposted by Cary Coglianese
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School @penncareylaw.bsky.social · 18/07/2025
Professor @cary-coglianese.bsky.social’s essay in Science draws on a recent report he coauthored with Cynthia Giles, entitled “Third-Party Auditing Cannot Guarantee Carbon Offset Credibility,” which is available online in the Penn Carey Law SSRN working paper series. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com
Third-Party Auditing Cannot Guarantee Carbon Offset Credibility
Many entities are pushing for carbon offsets to be part of the solution to climate change. The argument is that allowing organizations to pay others to reduce c
022 0