iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 18/09/2026

The hidden assumption is that the government will employ better people and make better decisions - as they've been doing.

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 11/06/2026

Again, we hear about taxing "billionaires" without mentioning that we're not proposing to tax their income but their property which usually has no constant value. We never hear that Wealth taxes around the world have failed. does anyone think this money would be used as advertised? Voodo economics!

110

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 23/05/2026

You're responding to an argument I'm not making. Yes, a progressive income tax is desirable, but wealth taxes have proven to be counterproductive if not disastrous.

010

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 23/05/2026

Again - it was a 90% top bracket with various deductions and exemptions but not a wealth tax. So much rhetoric is about being "fair" and doesn't mention taxing wealth and unrealized gains.

100

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 22/05/2026

We've never had a wealth tax. I'm talking about income taxes and yes, the top rate was about 90% but hardly anyone paid that. The effective rate was about 39% Wealth taxes have largely been abandoned in other countries because they didn't produce the expected revenue and were hard to enforce.

010

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 20/05/2026

Impeachment time! Impeachment NOW!

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 20/05/2026

Is that an excuse for not trying? Taxation won't do enough anyway, we have to do something about corruption. REMEMBER, wealth won't corrupt government unless we allow it. Start with Citizen's United. Move on to prosecution of bribe takers and insider trading.. REMEMBER wealth taxes don't work.

100

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 11/05/2026

Who says he has no sense of humor?

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 11/05/2026

No it's not, but the hidden assumption is that it describes the US economy and although undue influence is undeniable - and it may be growing - I don't think it is an accurate description (yet.) Russia and China perhaps.

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 07/05/2026

Don't drink crap from Kashyap.

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 01/05/2026

I think he meant he could have been a asteroid

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 30/04/2026

Cue the blame it on the billionaires club. Germany’s economy improved after Adolf Hitler became chancellor in 1933—but the recovery was driven by a mix of aggressive government spending, coercive policies, and preparation for war, not a normal or sustainable economic boom. Think about it.

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 29/04/2026

Do the math? you might do the time!

010

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 05/03/2026

But they didn't *say that. 10 yard penalty for fallacy.

010

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 05/03/2026

Wasn't Iran a Democracy before we ousted Mussadegh? Was Democracy an imminent threat to the Eisenhower administration?

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 05/03/2026

North Korea and Russia have been treats for much longer. Iraq was not - you lied about that. I think you're lying about this.

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 18/01/2026

His credibility, his credit rating, his approval and world respect is down.

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 17/01/2026

Don't forget protecting pedos.

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 10/01/2026

Oh Bull. Billionaires are not a group.

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 08/01/2026

Clear and unambiguous and damning. IT's murder www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-d...

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 08/01/2026

the DOJ rules for use of force are clear, unambiguous and DAMNING: www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-d...

justice.gov

1-16.000 - Department of Justice Policy On Use Of Force

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 08/01/2026

The Department of Justice rules for the use of deadly force are clear and unambiguous. Time to end the minstrel show and shut Dow the Fox treason machine READ IT! www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-d...

justice.gov

1-16.000 - Department of Justice Policy On Use Of Force

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 08/01/2026

The Department of Justice rules for the use of deadly force are clear and unambiguous. Fox News is an accessory after the fact to murder! www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-d...

justice.gov

1-16.000 - Department of Justice Policy On Use Of Force

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 08/01/2026

Department of Justice rules for the use of force are specific and incontrovertible. www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-d...

justice.gov

1-16.000 - Department of Justice Policy On Use Of Force

010

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 08/01/2026

There's no need to discuss this further. The Department of Justice rules call this an improper use of force www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-d...

justice.gov

1-16.000 - Department of Justice Policy On Use Of Force

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 08/01/2026

Actually the Department of Justice rules specifically state that the actions were illegal in every detail. Look at the rules: www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-d...

justice.gov

1-16.000 - Department of Justice Policy On Use Of Force

000

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 08/01/2026

This is in direct contradiction to the law: From Title 1, U.S. DOJ Policy on Use of Force: placing oneself in the path of a moving vehicle constitutes officer-created jeopardy and undermines any claim that deadly force was necessary.

041

Glenn R. Geist @captfogg.bsky.social · 08/01/2026

Title 1, U.S. DOJ Policy on Use of Force specifically forbids that action and includes: placing oneself in the path of a moving vehicle constitutes officer-created jeopardy and undermines any claim that deadly force was necessary. This was an open and shut case of murder.

0163