iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 19/09/2026

A cluster of CFP deadlines is closing today. Do not treat “IEEE” in the title as proof. Check the official society listing and the organizing committee before you pay a fee. callforpaper.org/discover

callforpaper.org

Discover Research Opportunities in Germany - CallForPaper

Find upcoming academic conferences, journals, and events in Germany and browse by scholarly subjects.

000

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 22/08/2026

Quick checklist before you hit submit this weekend: • Venue stacking? • Real keynotes? • Actual review timeline? • Committee that exists offline? Full evidence-backed registry: callforpaper.org/predatory-da... Protect your CV. Share with a colleague who’s about to submit.

callforpaper.org

The predatory conference industry didn't want a paper trail. We built one.

An open-source, CC0-licensed database tracking predatory academic conference organizers — every flag backed by archived evidence snapshots.

000

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 22/08/2026

4. Organizing committee LinkedIn freeze Search 3–4 names. If they have zero public activity related to the event, or the same names appear across 20 different “societies,” treat it as a red flag. Receipts matter more than claims.

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 22/08/2026

3. Acceptance in 48 hours + aggressive fees Real peer review takes weeks. Instant “congratulations, please pay” is a business model, not a conference. Also watch for invented metrics (“Global Impact Factor”) that no legitimate indexer uses.

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 22/08/2026

2. Keynote speakers who never agreed Email the listed keynotes at their university address (not the conference form). If they’ve never heard of the event, walk away. This single check has saved more early-career researchers than any ranking list.

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 22/08/2026

1. Same dates + same hotel + 10+ unrelated fields Biology, AI, soil science and law all “meeting” in one weekend? That’s not interdisciplinary. That’s a template. We documented 14 conferences at one Alexandria address on the exact same two days.

120

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 22/08/2026

Most researchers check indexing and still end up in the wrong venue. A Scopus claim or IEEE logo on a flyer proves almost nothing. Here’s the 90-second filter that actually protects your time and reputation this weekend:

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 21/08/2026

New CFPs just landed. Before you submit: 1. Check the organizing committee actually exists 2. Look for venue stacking 3. Verify the indexing claim Open evidence list of flagged organizers: callforpaper.org/predatory-da... Your time is worth more than a template conference.

callforpaper.org

The predatory conference industry didn't want a paper trail. We built one.

An open-source, CC0-licensed database tracking predatory academic conference organizers — every flag backed by archived evidence snapshots.

000

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 18/08/2026

Venue stacking is one of the fastest red flags for predatory conferences: 10+ unrelated topics (AI + biology + law) at the same hotel on the same weekend. Check the “upcoming” page before you pay. Open registry with receipts: callforpaper.org/predatory-da...

callforpaper.org

The predatory conference industry didn't want a paper trail. We built one.

An open-source, CC0-licensed database tracking predatory academic conference organizers — every flag backed by archived evidence snapshots.

010

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 17/08/2026

Your reputation and your calendar are finite. A clean rejection from a solid venue is useful. A paper in a low-quality or predatory event is not. Save the list. Share with a colleague who is currently writing abstracts. Full verified listings and tools: callforpaper.org/predatory-da...

callforpaper.org

The predatory conference industry didn't want a paper trail. We built one.

An open-source, CC0-licensed database tracking predatory academic conference organizers — every flag backed by archived evidence snapshots.

000

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 17/08/2026

One-minute checklist before you pay any fee or upload a paper: ✅ Committee names check out ✅ Society affiliation appears on the official society site ✅ Previous proceedings exist and are indexed ✅ Deadline gave reasonable notice

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 17/08/2026

Quick example from the current window: Several AI, big-data, and control conferences have deadlines between Aug 17–20. Some are legitimate IEEE/ACM series. Others look similar on the surface. The filter above separates them in under a minute.

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 17/08/2026

Fourth: check previous proceedings. If the conference claims Scopus / EI / IEEE Xplore, can you find last year’s volume? Or is the only evidence a logo on the homepage? Absence of prior proceedings is a strong signal.

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 17/08/2026

Third: verify the society claim. “In cooperation with IEEE” or “ACM” is easy to put on a website. Go to the actual IEEE or ACM conference calendar / technical co-sponsorship list and search for the exact name + year. If it’s not there, pause.

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 17/08/2026

Second: open the organizing committee page. Search 3–4 names on LinkedIn or Google Scholar. Do they actually list this conference? Do their affiliations match the website? Fake committees are still one of the most common red flags.

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 17/08/2026

First: look at the deadline itself. If a “major” IEEE/ACM event has a deadline that appeared only 2–3 weeks ago and the conference is in 8–10 weeks, treat it as high-risk until proven otherwise. Real venues usually give researchers more runway.

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 17/08/2026

Most researchers lose 3–6 months to the wrong conference. Not because the work was bad — because the venue was. Here’s the 60-second filter I use on every new CFP before I even open the submission portal. Thread:

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 16/08/2026

Quick verification checklist before you submit anywhere: – Does the organizing committee look real on LinkedIn? – Exact IEEE/ACM/Springer branding or just name-dropping? – Acceptance rate or past proceedings available? – Is the registration fee structured like a predatory cash grab?

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 16/08/2026

Two IEEE workshops closing 20 Aug: • ALCS 2026 – Artificial Learning for Cyber Security . IEEE Xplore. Strong focus on generative AI for security, biometrics, blockchain, healthcare cybersecurity. • WAIP 2026 – AI for Personalization (IEEE ICDM workshop, Shenyang).

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 16/08/2026

UCC 2026 (IEEE/ACM Utility and Cloud Computing) Deadline: 19 Aug Florianópolis, Brazil Solid IEEE/ACM venue. Cloud, utility computing, distributed systems. Good track record.

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 16/08/2026

MMM 2027 (Multimedia Modeling) Deadline: today, 16 Aug 2026 Siem Reap, Cambodia | 5–8 Jan 2027 CCF Rank C • CORE Rank B • DBLP Springer LNCS. Regular papers up to 12 content pages. Special sessions on embodied multimedia, multimodal agents, spatial intelligence, medical multimodal vision.

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 16/08/2026

Most researchers only check “is it indexed?” That’s not enough. Here’s a tight filter for the CFPs closing in the next 4 days — plus the ones that actually carry real signal.

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 15/08/2026

• ECHO 2026 – Edge-Cloud-HPC workshop at SC’26 (Chicago) • IEEE MedAI 2026 • EO4CUR – ACM SIGSPATIAL workshop on Earth Observation • SESAME @ JCDL 2026 • IEEE ICEBE 2026

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 15/08/2026

1. Can you find the organising committee on real institutional pages? 2. Does the claimed IEEE/ACM affiliation actually appear on the society’s own site? 3. Is the review timeline realistic?

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 14/08/2026

Most researchers stop at the indexing badge. That’s how time, money, and reputation get wasted. Always check: • Are the organizing chairs real and findable on university pages? • Do previous proceedings actually exist in the claimed library? • Does the review timeline look realistic?

100

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 04/08/2026

🆕 Newly Listed This Week: 🟢 EDAI 2026 — Aug 19 🏛️ Wuhan, China 🟢 CIFEM-ST 2026 — Sep 15 🏛️ CRMEF Casablanca Settat 🟢 CPS@SAC 2027 — Oct 2 🏛️ Gwangju, South Korea 🔍 Full list → callforpaper.org?utm_source=bsky #CFP #AcademicTwitter #CallForPapers

callforpaper.org

CallForPaper.org — The verified ecosystem for academic events and calls for papers

Discover verified academic conferences, symposiums, and calls for papers worldwide. CallForPaper.org connects researchers, organizers, and universities in one verified ecosystem.

000

CallForPaper.org @callforpaper.org · 01/08/2026

How We Verify IEEE & Society Affiliation Claims A look inside the process callforpaper.org uses to verify IEEE, ACM, Springer, and Elsevier affiliation claims — built from reviewing 400+ academic conferences. blog.callforpaper.org/p/how-we-ver...

blog.callforpaper.org

How We Verify IEEE & Society Affiliation Claims

A look inside the process callforpaper.org uses to verify IEEE, ACM, Springer, and Elsevier affiliation claims — built from reviewing 400+ academic conferences.

000