Sign in

Brian Kemper

@bwkemper.bsky.social
669 followers 248 following 21.6K posts

Attorney, father, Peloton addict, writer, and Eternal Keeper of the Final Word. I don't reciprocate follows automatically nor do I follow accounts who don't post interesting content. Check out my novel "Everything Can Change" available on Amazon.

PostsRepliesMedia
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 3h
Okay, I guess he wasn’t the one citing the dictionary. That was a reader comment to his post. I bought he screenshot it. But the interaction is still unbelievable.
010 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
static.klipy.com
Seth Meyers: Right?!
Alt: Seth Meyers: Right?!
120 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
This is unbelievable. A guy is citing Merriam Webster’s dictionary )incorrectly) as support for his really bad assertion that the Merriam Webster account is wrong.
140 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
She’s trying to deflect from the absence of any type of support and logiv for her arguments in this thread. So she decided to attack me by painting me as a sexist man who mansplains and who gets involved in threads where I think women can’t handle themselves and must have my help.
220 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
That your comment is idiotic? Yes it was.
100 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
And again, that’s not how the term came up. And I’ve never been told by any of the women who side I have joined that they were insulted by me. And having interacted with many of them, I know they’d let me know. Whereas you are deflecting from the fact that your arguments are equine excrement.
000 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
I also further showed you that I was “better” at this when I cited legal provisions backing my assertions whereas you can’t.
100 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
Oh Gracie. I’ve been running rings around you but you’re too dumb to get it. Like when I pointed out how your reading skills sucked the Webster’s language re: chivalry I highlighted expressly was about “Today” and not the Middle Ages.
100 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
If you didn’t enter into that agreement and you don’t know that I did, why would you think that “we” all agreed to that? I don’t need citations. It’s an idiotic comment on its face.
100 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
That was my point Gracie, that “especially” was only with regard to the definition. But you used it as if that’s what I said when I talked about my penchant for helping people. And that I “especially” do it for women. When I don’t.
took
100 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
And you have displayed them:
100 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
Also, i see you couldn’t respond to how the language I pointed to about “chivalrous” was about how it is used “today.” Instead you tried to deflect with a tired attack.
000 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
Blah, blah. blah. God, you’re not even good at twisting words. The word “especially” wasn’t used with regard to when I help people.
200 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
Look at you making things up again. You really have a limited set of tools.
100 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
Why would I start a new thread with such an obvious and disengenuous troll like you?
100 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
No I am not. Because you think I believe that “poor souls” is synonymous with “poor women.” Because “chivalrous” is rarely used with men’s interactions with men, that’s why I thought you were referring to women. “Poor souls” had nothing to do with it.
100 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
Although I think her method is usually to try to help them realize they need to correct themselves. When they don’t, it’s time for that ideal.
110 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
i agree that men can. be chivalrous towards other men. But the word is rarely used in that context.
200 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
We weren’t, Gracie. Read the highlighted sentence again. What’s the first word?
Today
200 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
Talk about missing words. The sentence I highlighted starts with “Today.” Again, please keep up.
today
000 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
That’s absolutely one of her ideals.
110 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 4h
You see if you had not had used “chivalrous” I would not have thought “poor souls” is synonymous with “poor women.” But because chivalrous is “especially” used with men’s interactions with women, that is the reason for my comment.
100 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
I was right in knowing that you needed further explanation. bsky.app/profile/bwke...
100 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
Because “chivalry” is as the definition explains most often used with men’s interactions with women. Whether that’s how you meant it is irrelevant to why I referred to women, which you attributed to the phrase “poor souls.”
100 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
Oh Gracie, you literally said that “poor souls” is synonymous with “poor women. My chivalrous point was explaining to you why I referenced “women” and why it had nothing to do with why phrase “poor souls.” Please keep up.
women
200 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
No, didn’t miss it. It doesn’t change the point, Gracie.
100 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
You missed the first point that I said that others have done the same with me. They don’t see me as a “poor soul” nor do I see them that way. But you keep on doing you. It’s clearly working really well for you here.
000 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
Also, the most important step a man can take is the next one.
Bondsmith
110 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
“I accept this journey.”
Bridge 4
110 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
Ah but at least that hill has logical merit. It’s only “stupid” because of tye size of the “hill.” Her hill doesn’t even meet the former.
110 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
Or shit sometimes you know they don’t even need you to join in but wil enjoy if you do.
010 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
Because you realize it’s about the journey and not the destination.
140 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
static.klipy.com
Psych Shawn
Alt: Psych Shawn
010 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
I think she understands but knows she can’t support her argument but just wants to be insulting and condescending to people who can support theirs.
390 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
Hell, she should at least have to provide the sources of law that she says “contradict” the law you cite. She has chosen not to do so.
150 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
Also if you noticed, others have also joined me in proving you wrong. We don’t see each other as “poor souls.” Helping people doesn’t mean you look down on the people or they are less than.
220 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 5h
I never claimed to have superior intellect. I claimed to have greater knowledge than you about the subject at hand. Also it was your use of the term “chivalrous” that suggested you were referring to women. Way to try to make me look sexist again though. Victim playing again I see.
chivalry
220 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 6h
static.klipy.com
Miriam Maisel: She Has No Idea
Alt: Miriam Maisel: She Has No Ideam
010 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 6h
Blah, blah, blah. Whether they were women or men, I would have done the same. In fact, I have done so many times when trolls like you prove the validity of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
240 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 6h
I should note that because of your reply, I realized that Shauna was making the same argument I was. Big screw up on my part.
110 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 6h
No problem.
100 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 6h
here, I see any argument you have as a way to try to play the victim when again it was your replies above with others that I have been addressing.
010 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 6h
condescending or patronizing, it was in response to your far greater condescending and patronizing tone you had with others. C) And yes, if the argument made is that same as woman were arguing in the same context, I don’t think its mansplaing. I couod be wrong but given your overall tone …
230 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 6h
A) No it doesn’t because as I also explained, mansplaining requires explaining a subject to a woman who knows the subject well, probably even better than the man. You’ve demonstrated that you don’t. B) Mansplaing would also require undeserved condescension. To the extent that I have been …
140 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 6h
The reply you responded to wasn’t in reply to you.
110 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 6h
As a note. the NY Rules of Professional Conduct were based on the ABA’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct that was adopted by every state and DC. So every state’s rules have the same language in that part.
010 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 6h
I do. And while you chose to be on social media to bullshit about a subject you know nothing about, I chose to use my time on the subject that am I familiar with. And your participation is completely voluntary.
000 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 6h
www.dccourts.gov/sites/defaul...
dccourts.gov
110 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 6h
ABAlaw
110 0
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social · 6h
I expressly referenced others citing the law, but I can do so too.
my
130 0