iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Bud @budfromthenorth.bsky.social · 21/12/2024

What a waste of human life and productivity just to achieve the opposite of their own state policy.

020 2

Bud @budfromthenorth.bsky.social · 19/12/2024

I'm sure they would have been such upstanding citizens if it weren't for the violence and horror 🙄

000 0

Bud @budfromthenorth.bsky.social · 17/12/2024

What does this have to do with the blood bag dogs?

Both bids were invalidated because of the process. The lower bid is only better if you ignore that it was mostly debt. The trustee can still sell Infowars to the Onion. You can feel however you want about the judge but there's zero evidence supporting the claim that the judge is biased.

100 1

Just because I wasn't born here doesn't mean I'm not American. Frankly guy, fuck off.

000 0

I was born in Scotland but yea, I'm American. This guy is a wacko, no idea what his problem is.

100 1

If everyone agrees that what he was doing was so egregious that he should be killed, then the solution should have been legislative and judicial, not an individual killing him because of his personal opinion. Individuals making such decisions is not healthy for the country.

000 0

Loool my calling your assumption inappropriate isn't me saying that I'm not American, quite the opposite actually.

200 2

The only thing weird here is assuming that I'm not American.

100 1

I'm not sure, it barely works.

How many people believe Fauci is evil? Should they go shoot him? Individuals aren't fit to make such decisions and id rather not see the country desend into that nonsense. Your opinion on who's evil, my opinion on who's evil, they don't matter. People can't be allowed to kill eachother over opinion.

100 1

The lower bid would not have been better given that it was partially unsecured debt to be paid back with future earnings. Neither bid was sufficient because of the confusing sealed bidding process with no transparency. What bid the families want isn't relevant to a the same of assets in a bankruptcy

100 1

I'd take how things are now over the suffering and death that would occur is everyone is killing those they think are evil.

100 1

You don't see your hypocrisy?You think people should die at the hands of individuals for inflicting suffering on others, and then say there should be a revolution where tens of millions will suffer. You don't recognize that people would consider you just as evil as those you think should be killed?

100 1

Then you're wishing for death and suffering far beyond what the CEOs you hate are inflicting on the country.

200 2

Then maybe you should convince the moderates to vote with you instead of driving them away by suggesting that people should kill those they think are evil... The average person isnt going to vote with homicidal moralists who don't care about the consequences of their violence.

100 1

Okay, so you believe those who you agree with should murder those they believe are evil. Then If those you disagree with play the same stupid game, where do you think that leads?

100 1

When did I say any of that? You live in a country that elected trump and you really trust random individuals to decide who should die?

100 1

The corrupt should fear the justice system. Letting individuals decide who should die is to say that you'd trust trump supporters decide who is evil enough to warrant death as well. This is a stupid road to go down, individuals shouldn't be making such decisions.

100 1

You really think any random person should be making the judgement of who is evil enough to warrant death? It'd be a lot more people dead than the CEOs if it came to that. This isn't a good road to go down.

210 2

If you want to hate people, go right ahead, but people murdering those they hate leads to the breakdown of society.

000 0

Uhhhh yea sure, you can fund the legal counsel of murderers if you wish.

100 1

Society doesn't work if everyone kills those they believe is evil, is why we have a judiciary.

100 1

Why do you think that wishing for the assassination of your political opponents is okay?

100 1

Somehow I don't think you grasp the concept of self defense.

000 0

You can assume what you'd like, regardless there are no facts to support the claim.

000 0

I'm not going to assume that this is going to go horribly wrong, there's some possibility that SSG values restoring order, but HTS having control is somewhat concerning given that Al-Nusra was basically ISIS without global ambitions. No idea what Erdogan was thinking backing them.

000 0

Cannon has a history of repeated questionable rulings supporting the idea that she's biased. Saying that Judge Lopez is biased in favour of the crazy conspiracy guy over what seems like a sane ruling with no similar history of questionable ruling just seems like a stretch.

210 2

The way its being reported by some makes it sound like he joined the revolution, didn't realize that's as a politician. Id love to know under what governments. Engineer until the war started and then a politician of some sort for the last 13 years in an area controlled by various groups.

000 0

The judge himself called the process confusing...

020 2

Does anyone know which rebel group he was fighting for prior to the formation of HTS?

000 0

Creating a confusing closed process lacking transparency that discourages bids and then using the lack of bids as an excuse to choose the lowest bid received isn't the trustee's right. The trustee has an obligation to maximize profits after all.

The lack of bids was an issue raised in motions and during the hearings. The judge stated that the bidding process lacked transparency, was confusing, that it should have been public. Throwing out both of the two bids as inadequate is essentially ordering a new auction.

100 1

The trustee's process is why there were only two bids, so you're using an issue created by the trustee as justification for the trustee's further poor decisions which simply doesn't hold up. Also, your prejudice isn't relevant to the facts of this decision.

100 1

I'm not aware of any right of claimants to decide how they're compensated. Judge Lopez ordered the assets sold to pay debts to those claimants and the trustee is there to do that. The trustee taking the lowest cash offer is a failure. As for your prejudice, it isn't some win so keep it to yourself.

100 1

The trustee is not here to ensure that the site be shut down. The plaintiffs wanting the site shut down has nothing to do with the Court's decision or the bankruptcy. The trustee is here to auction off Infowars and the way they tried to do that was in many ways improper.

110 1

The only reason an Infowars sponsor was the largest cash bid was because the trustee failed to hold an open bidding process and as a result there were only two bids. Also, the families cannot tell the trustee to rig the bidding process in favour of the party they like the most.

100 1

The problem wasn't The Onion, the problem was the trustee's process for selling Infowars. No open bidding, the process was changed midway through, the lowest cash bid was accepted, and much of the bid was debt in the form of future earnings that weren't guaranteed.

3170 17

The trustee had an obligation to the families, to Alex Jones, and to the public to hold fair and open bidding on Infowars. The Onion was the lowest bid received and much of the bid was in the form of debt to be paid back with future earning. Blame the trustee on this one.

110 1

The auction process wasn't fair nor open and the families could make significantly more if it had been. A solid move by the court given the failure of the trustee to fulfill their obligation.

100 1

Dangerous for Iran doesn't necessarily mean good for the world.

000 0

www.wyden.senate.gov/imo/media/do... All this law does is mandate annual security audits and allow the FCC to create rules. This isn't even close to enough.

wyden.senate.gov

000 0

It would be best for everyone involved if Biden would pardon as many people as possible before his departure.

000 0