iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

So NASA are saying it’s not a big deal, scientists are saying it’s not a big deal But wait! Sports journalist Johnny from Bloomberg says it’s a huge deal so I guess we should panic

361

This is just not true lol. SpaceX does take extreme care with debris mitigation They deorbit all spent stages when they can, put them in graveyards orbits when they can’t and have a very high success rate with doing so

130

So this was from crew missions and was a bit more complicated than “whatevering” the situation. Basically Crew Dragon has two parts the Trunk (used for cargo on cargo missions and used for stability in an abort for crew missions) and the spacecraft itself 1/4

150

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 26/07/2026

Very misleading headline and article It's not "out of control" as in spiralling after a malfunction. It launched two lunar landers for NASA last year then went into a graveyard orbit (as standard for any rocket on a mission like this...besides INTENTIONALLY hitting the moon)

140

Notice how none of this actually changes anything I said

240

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 26/07/2026

Genuinely have no idea how this is the best argument they have for the cost difference.

040

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 25/07/2026

He did cancel it and rightfully because it was a failing program and what followed it was far more successful and beneficial

1131

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 25/07/2026

Btw the information reported here is fabricated

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 12/07/2026

Except it doesn’t ban collaboration. Just restricts NSF funded research so that it’s not conducted with designated entities because China has been using this for espionage for years now And China is not a direct parallel to the USSR. Both operated very different in very different circumstances

000

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 12/07/2026

Except the U.S. didn’t get mad over either of these and China did share lunar samples with US institutions They also talked about an exchange of samples by both but that didn’t go anywhere iirc

000

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 12/07/2026

Literally not even remotely true and completely ignores WHY there’s such things as the wolf amendment China has a history of technology transfer that enables them to outcompete the U.S. when they otherwise would struggle Rocketry would be very much one of those

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 02/06/2026

Don’t abuse NASA for your bullshit political dog whistling pls

110

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 29/05/2026

Of course the tourists are here to give their retarded takes on this Rockets are hard, these things happen It’s not indicative that the current industry is magically flawed and that NASA would never see a failure

271

Reposted by BSF 🐀🇬🇧

NASAWATCH @nasawatch.bsky.social · 24/05/2026

This is a real photo. Not CGI. Not AI. Not Kerbal Space Program. Not a still from a SciFi movie. It shows real spaceships doing their thing in space. #AdAstra y'all #SpaceX #Starship #Flight12

1357

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 24/05/2026

SpaceX literally operates the most reliable rocket every developed but ok

050

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 24/05/2026

It literally can get into orbit. Fallacy of premise

050

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 24/05/2026

This was the 7th overall success for the program. 6th successful splashdown

050

Show me where on their financials they have “subsidies” listed

120

That it made a full mission. It flew, deployed, entered and splashed down bang on target. This was literally the full profile lmfao

040

Yes after it had completed the entire fucking mission XD Like you guys really don’t grasp how retarded you sound to literally anyone who understands this stuff

You mean the ship? After its mission? No shit. It tipped over as expected. This was an anticipated result The flight had ended

030

Notice how that’s not the rocket they fly

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 22/05/2026

Neither does SpaceX What even are these slop takes

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 17/05/2026

CRS-34 The 34th NASA resupply mission to ISS aboard Dragon

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 17/05/2026

There are literally thousands of real spaceflight enthusiasts who actually are excited. Yall are just tourists

141

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 12/04/2026

You guys gonna be seething when this drops

350

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 03/04/2026

This is the ISS btw. NOT Artemis 2

040

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 03/04/2026

“We have lots of work to do back home but here, earth sure looks like a perfect world” Jared Issacman (I4 + PD cmdr, NASA admin)

121

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 26/03/2026

People buying shares from dodgy second hand sellers are unsure if those shares are legit or not Is this…a surprise? Is this implying it’s SpaceX’s fault?

120

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 24/03/2026

The plans were shit. They failed for 2 solid decades

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 18/03/2026

NASA bout to send people to the moon and the best argument against it is bible math

BSF 🐀🇬🇧 @bsf42069.bsky.social · 20/02/2026

Simple. They wanted redundant capabilities. That was the driving force NASA was well aware of the CM and deorbit zero fault shortfalls but waived them to get the vehicle to fly praying the issue that they never actually identified from the first two was fixed