brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/10/2026That's a fair criticism that a few others have raised as well, but it's also a criticism that comes from a place of good faith, which puts you at least 10 steps ahead of the guy who was responding to me 120
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Is it? arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...arstechnica.comMan told ChatGPT he was feeling delusional. ChatGPT insisted he was Jesus.Man with bipolar disorder sued OpenAI after surviving ChatGPT-linked suicide attempt. 170
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/10/2026It's the last line of that bit that I'm drawing a similarity too. LLMs do not have a conception of truth or falsehood. They aren't designed to produce output that humans perceive as true; they're designed to produce output that gets humans to keep engaging with them. 160
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/10/2026As a counterpoint, LLMs are also convincing people they are God. LLMs produce sequences of tokens that are probabilistic based on their training. That they *may* produce truthful information is incidental.arstechnica.comMan told ChatGPT he was feeling delusional. ChatGPT insisted he was Jesus.Man with bipolar disorder sued OpenAI after surviving ChatGPT-linked suicide attempt. 110
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 03/10/2026You are begging the question about what constitutes bullshit (in the formal sense of the term "begging the question"). I'd recommend reading the Frankfurt paper first to see why the term is accurate. 3390
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 03/10/2026It's a pejorative term for LLMs, since LLMs produce bullshit (in the Harry Frankfurt "On Bullshit" sense of the term) 4281
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 03/10/2026I think that it is good for people to get out of false or conspiratorial thinking, but I am worried about the psychological mechanism at work here that makes people willing to trust the bullshit engine and externalize judgement to a machine instead of trusting researchers and experts 9950
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 30/09/2026I just want to join the chorus of voices asking "wtf how did they score KH2 a 7/10?" 010
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 16/09/2026In computer science, I would wager that 1 and 3 are generally low, but with a rate of ten times higher for papers that don't open source any code they write or models they produce as part of their paper. Poor use of stats is everywhere. It's terrifying to me how few academics have stats training. 001
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 13/09/2026The same type of people who smoked weed in America 30 years ago (before the widespread push for medical legalization) 010
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 10/09/2026I made a similar observation in response to the claim that China is behind the anti-datacenter trend in the US. As far as I can tell, "wait for the other guy to run out of money" is working pretty well as a strategy 060
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 09/09/2026On the other hand, my program made me take vector calculus (which I have never used outside of vector calculus class), and for that I will never forgive them 000
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 09/09/2026My CS degree also required zero classes in ethics or philosophy. It obviously should be a requirement, but I'm also concerned that it wouldn't do a lot since every case study of unethical behavior could be pulled from a company that had raised or is raising billions of dollars in startup capital 100
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 07/09/2026This has led software devs to wildly overestimate how useful these tools are outside of their field. They often don't seem to realize that there were a ton of structural and data-availability advantages for LLM use in coding that can't be generalized to any other field 7552
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 07/09/2026That's a part of this conversation that I've only seen raised recently: there is a ton of domain-specific training information (every public GitHub repo, every language's public docs) for having LLMs generate code, and it's possible to automate the loop of generating and testing code. 1240
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 05/09/2026Americans are about as likely to be killed in a motor vehicle accident as they are by a gun (it's about a 15% difference). In the US, the average gun kills fewer people each year than the average car. 090
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 05/09/2026And I'm pretty sure that the second one doesn't even know what outside is. She's literally living the life of cat royalty 010
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 05/09/2026My first cat is a rescue who had been living outside prior to getting picked up by the shelter. Since we adopted, he has gone outside once, and I'm pretty sure he considers it the worst experience of his life. 1200
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026Just to ensure I'm understanding you right, you are saying that if I oppose fascism by whatever means necessary, I am exactly like the fascists, correct? I just want to be sure that's what you're saying, because it's really hard to understand you with all of that boot in your mouth 010
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026I mean, if you take issue with that, you don't have to have a jury trial. You have the right to one, if you want, but you can waive that right and have a bench trial. If it's a case where the law is counterintuitive or complex, that generally works in your favor. 010
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026You would allow the advancement and enforcement of fascist laws because you are unwilling to lie to the fascists enforcing those laws. Do you believe that that is an anti-fascist position to take? 110
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026I hope that's freak (complimentary) and not freak (derogatory) 310
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026What if the law is explicitly fascist? Are you going to ignore your conscience and enforce a law that, for example, prevents women from using any form of birth control? 110
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026If you don't want that, then you can waive your right to a jury trial. 000
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026I think we should take a step back and examine that a little bit: isn't it crazy fucked up that the only people serving on a death penalty jury are people who believe that killing people is acceptable? I'm not suggesting you should lie. But also state-sponsored murder is a lot worse than lying 110
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026You are anti-ICE and anti-fascist. I am too. If I was arrested because of a fascist law that I disagreed with morally (and there are more of these every day now), I would strongly prefer that the jury be able to vote their conscience rather than just applying the law with no thought. 110
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026It's commentary from a judge that isn't consequential to the core holding in the case 000
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026I'm pretty sure that I was taught that lower courts defer to appellate court rulings. Is that not the case? (also, and I promise I mean this in a cheeky way, I'm pretty sure that if you are a lawyer, your job is frequently to say that things are settled law when they aren't) 110
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026If you violated a law because you thought the law was immoral or wrong, or because you had no other options, you might want jurors who took morality seriously instead of machines that voted exactly on the lines of the law 230
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026"if the judge finds out" is doing some really heavy lifting there 140
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026The oath isn't something prescribed by statute, it's just a tradition in the court. Your conscience is why most oaths end in "so help you God" 140
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026They do have the right. Juries can't be punished for the verdict they return. You can't bring up nullification as a litigant, but you also can't give instructions that jurors must ignore their conscience and vote only based on the law (US v. Moylan) 1210
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026It is how they work. There's two centuries of jurisprudence on this en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nu...en.wikipedia.orgJury nullification in the United States - Wikipedia 110
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026They can. Nullification typically refers to acquitting, but can also refer to finding someone guilty. 330
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 04/09/2026The internal ongoings of a jury are as close to sacred as the US justice system has. A juror has an inherent right to set aside the law or instructions and vote their conscience. 5460
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 02/09/2026He basically has just reinvented Rotten Tomatoes, with the difference being which group is giving numeric reviews and which is giving thumbs up/down reviews. 000
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 01/09/2026It's a way of altering a large language model to remove guardrails that prevent it from doing certain types of tasks. 010
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 29/08/2026The issue isn't that China believes this to be vaporware, it's that they already have demonstrated that they can produce similar results at far lower costs. If my opponent is going to do the same thing as me but it's going to cost him 10 times as much, I'm not going to try to stop that 120
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 29/08/2026I am not sure if I'm following your reasoning here. Why would China want us to build less data centers? They seem like they have a lot to gain from making us build a ton of these and then watching the bubble pop 380
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 27/08/2026You said that the LLMs were being used to find and fix bugs in code, and now you say they are only finding bugs. Which one is it? (We know for a fact that LLMs are generating code that is being used in FOSS projects, including in the Linux kernel.) 110
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 27/08/2026I feel like smart developers might be inclined to question the way that the huge open question regarding the authorship of LLM-generated text might impact the continuity of their project 140
brndn_m @brndnm.bsky.social · 27/08/2026I feel like the FOSS community should incredibly hostile to the use of LLMs in code just on an ideological basis: you don't need to move fast and break things in an open-source scenario! 1251