Sign in

briana-mac.bsky.social

@briana-mac.bsky.social
26 followers 14 following 12 posts

MD/PhD Candidate at the University of Pennsylvania & Princeton Alum

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by briana-mac.bsky.social
Steven Meisler @stevenmeisler.com · 01/10/2026
There are many MRI approaches for studying myelin. But which ones are reliable, how do they relate to each other, and how do they behave in gray vs white matter? In our new preprint, we introduce Myelin Imaging Reliability and ReprOducibility Resource (MIRROR) 🧠🪞 📄🔗 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
14219
Reposted by briana-mac.bsky.social
Joëlle Bagautdinova @joelleba.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
Thrilled to share that this work is now published in Nature Human Behavior!!! 🥳🎉 doi.org/10.1038/s415...
doi.org
Anatomical white matter tracts span the cortical hierarchy to support cognitive diversity - Nature Human Behaviour
Bagautdinova et al. study how white matter tracts are organized along the brain’s hierarchy and how they connect diverse biological environments to support complex human cognition and neurodevelopment.
13310
briana-mac.bsky.social @briana-mac.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
With special thanks to my incredibly amazing PhD co-advisers @ted-satterthwaite.bsky.social and @aarona-b.bsky.social!!!
010
briana-mac.bsky.social @briana-mac.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
@audreycluo.bsky.social, @apmackey.bsky.social, Michael Milham, Tyler Moore, @valeriejsydnor.bsky.social, @kevin-y-sun.bsky.social, Fang-Cheng Yeh, Ran Barzilay, @drdamienfair.bsky.social, and Russell T. Shinohara 🙏
110
briana-mac.bsky.social @briana-mac.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Huge thank you to this incredible team: @joelleba.bsky.social, @stevenmeisler.com, @cieslakmatt.bsky.social, @lucindasisk.bsky.social, Christos Davatzikos, Alexandre Franco, @meikehettwer.bsky.social, @ariellekeller.bsky.social, Gregory Kiar,
110
briana-mac.bsky.social @briana-mac.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Overall: The childhood environment isn’t just associated with isolated brain regions. It is embedded across large-scale white matter architecture by late childhood. Studying the full exposome reveals effects we would miss with single proxies.
141
briana-mac.bsky.social @briana-mac.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Finding 6: Replicates across independent data Results generalize to the Healthy Brain Network, despite differences in sampling, clinical enrichment imaging, and how the exposome is measured. These effects are robust.
150
briana-mac.bsky.social @briana-mac.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Finding 5: Rethinking brain–cognition links Associations between white matter and cognition drop by ~80% after accounting for the exposome. Many brain–behavior relationships may reflect shared environmental influences.
140
briana-mac.bsky.social @briana-mac.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Finding 4: Stronger than common proxies White matter predicts the exposome better than commonly used measures like: - household income - parental education - neighborhood disadvantage Capturing the complex childhood environment matters.
140
briana-mac.bsky.social @briana-mac.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Finding 3: Strong multivariate associations High-dimensional patterns of white matter features explain ~25% of variance of the exposome in unseen individuals. These results highlight a strong link between brain structure and the childhood environment.
140
briana-mac.bsky.social @briana-mac.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Finding 2: Effects are organized along the brain’s hierarchy Effects are not random: they follow the sensorimotor-association axis. Tracts that span the hierarchy, linking lower- to higher-order regions, show the strongest associations with the environment.
140
briana-mac.bsky.social @briana-mac.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Finding 1: Widespread, highly replicable effects The exposome is linked to most white matter features across the brain. More advantaged environments → larger tract structure and lower orientation dispersion Effects replicate across independent splits.
140
briana-mac.bsky.social @briana-mac.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
The childhood environment is complex, spanning socioeconomic factors, family dynamics, and enrichment. Instead of studying one factor at a time, we use the exposome to capture this complexity. Then we ask: how is this reflected in white matter?
140
briana-mac.bsky.social @briana-mac.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
How much does the childhood environment shape the brain? In our new preprint, we study the exposome (300+ environmental exposures) and link it to white matter structure in 8,000+ kids. 🧠✨ 🔗 Read the preprint: bit.ly/4wfsybZ 🧵 Thread below
bit.ly
White matter reflects the childhood exposome
The childhood environment is critical for brain development. However, most neuroimaging studies examine individual environmental measures (e.g., socioeconomic status) or a limited set of exposures, obscuring how the combination of complex, real-world exposures jointly influence brain development. Here we investigated how white matter shape and tissue properties are linked to the childhood exposome, a multidimensional measure capturing over 300 environmental exposures. Using multi-shell diffusion MRI from 8,183 children (ages 9-10) in the ABCD study, we quantified microstructural and macrostructural properties across 62 person-specific white matter tracts. The exposome showed widespread and highly replicable associations with both white matter microstructure and macrostructure: more advantaged environments were associated with larger tract macrostructure and lower orientation dispersion. Principal component analysis revealed that the dominant axis of exposome-white matter covariation aligns with the cortical sensorimotor-association hierarchy, such that tracts spanning this hierarchy exhibit the strongest associations with the exposome. Multivariate models demonstrated that patterns of white matter features explained 25% of the variance in the exposome in unseen individuals. Notably, white matter-based prediction of cognition was markedly reduced after accounting for the exposome (~82% reduction in explained variance), indicating that brain-cognition associations overlap substantially with variance captured by the exposome. These findings generalized to independent data from the Healthy Brain Network (n=869), which differs substantially from ABCD in MRI acquisition, participant selection, and childhood environments. Together, these results suggest that white matter architecture strongly reflects the childhood environment. ### Competing Interest Statement A.A.B. has consulted for Octave Bioscience and holds equity in Centile Bioscience. RB is on the Advisory Board and holds equity in Taliaz Health. D.A.F. is a founder of Turing Medical. Any potential conflict of interest has been reviewed and managed by the University of Minnesota. D.A.F. is an inventor of the FIRMM Technology 2198 (FIRMM, real-time monitoring and prediction of motion in MRI scans, exclusively licensed to Turing Medical). Any potential conflict of interest has been reviewed and managed by the University of Minnesota. This research was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (T32MH019112 to S.L.M.; R37MH125829 to D.A.F. and T.D.S.; 2R01MH112847 to R.T.S. and T.D.S.; R01MH120482 to T.D.S.; 2R01MH113550 to T.D.S.; R01MH123550 to R.T.S; F30MH138048 to K.Y.S.; RF1MH121868, RF1MH121867, RF1MH126699, R01AG060942, U19AG066567, R01EY033628, and R01EB027585 to A.R.; R01MH134886 to R.B.; T32MH016804 and T32MH018951 to V.J.S; R01MH133843 to A.A.B.; F31MH136685 to J.B.). S.L.M. was supported by the Hartwell Foundation (S.L.M.); G.S. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). A.S.K. is supported by a NARSAD Young Investigator Award from the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation. M.D.H. was supported by the German Research Foundation (project number 572317568). LMS was supported by a NSF SBE Postdoctoral Research Fellowship (#2507497).
13120