iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

I think we’re done here.

100

Did you not read the article or even the full headline?

200

The FB campus and data center there is not yet operational. The only problems that have occurred (which are legitimate!) have nothing to do AI or data center operations (which will use no water as it is a closed loop design). They were due to building construction.

100

Brandon Paddock @brandonlive.com · 20/07/2026

Ah, thanks for sharing! This is a widely referenced and thoroughly debunked example. In fact, this article itself debunks what I think you are claiming?

100

I reported and blocked this person, but this is not even the first time I’ve been threatened on this platform out of the blue by some sicko. This place is cursed and worse than anything I ever experienced on any other social media site. This is not okay @bsky.app.

450

Brandon Paddock @brandonlive.com · 08/07/2026

I guess naming my last car “Sparky” wasn’t very original. This also made me realize I haven’t actually given my new car a name. Thinking about InfoSecTaycanSwift.

010

Brandon Paddock @brandonlive.com · 21/01/2026

I knew if I took a little time I could create a simple utility app that would do what I wanted, but I never find the time for little projects like this. But using CC, I was able to get something really handy up and running in no time at all.

020

Brandon Paddock @brandonlive.com · 16/12/2025

That is simply not what the data says. CR gives the 2023 Model Y a 67 / 100 for reliability. This is the same score they gave the 2024 Audi A4. The 2023 Mustang Mach-E has a reliability score of 38 / 100. The 2023 BMW i4 got 48.

210

Read the article. It’s about 5-10 year old cars, and explicitly says this:

110

Musk sucks which is why I no longer drive a Tesla. But it is true they make fantastic cars, and Consumer Reports ranks them in their top ten for reliability. This article is about old 5-10 year old used cars. As it says…

211

They aren’t, as the article (which is about 5-10 year old models) says:

000

Brandon Paddock @brandonlive.com · 13/12/2025

Important context from the article, which is about 5-10 year old models:

000

Every time I read about OpenAI saying the 5.1 and 5.2 chat models (the ones they basically say not to use) can do “light reasoning” I think of this:

230

Brandon Paddock @brandonlive.com · 10/12/2025

You will be visited by three spirits.

010

Brandon Paddock @brandonlive.com · 05/12/2025

That exchange started with this reply from her to a thread she wasn’t previously part of. Her first statement is simply wrong. Her second is a non-sequitur and a straw man argument. From there l tried to engage earnestly in a productive conversation, but she proved unwilling to do that.

100

Brandon Paddock @brandonlive.com · 27/10/2025

There’s no language model involved here (indeed, that would be the way to fix this). It’s a simple rule-based suggestion they have. It doesn’t matter what topic you put there. This is the Google Docs mobile app:

000

Brandon Paddock @brandonlive.com · 27/10/2025

Google Docs appears to make this suggestion for any use of this construction.

000

Brandon Paddock @brandonlive.com · 28/09/2025

Well, for one thing, it doesn’t fit the relevant definition of the word. Is incarceration harmful? Sure, but that’s true of any penalty.

100

Brandon Paddock @brandonlive.com · 13/07/2025

Oh no, I did. Why did you circle the thing he said that isn’t true, and is totally different from what you asserted above? And in case you think there was any ambiguity, he doubled down on it in multiple forks of the thread.

110

You understand this is saying almost verbatim exactly what I’ve been saying, and firstly refutes what the OP is claiming. Right? Like, you did read it before replying, right? Because it kind of seems like you didn’t?

200

What? No, that’s not true at all. He said he has no evidence. Race isn’t a factor here and I didn’t even know his race when I responded. You’re trying to justify lying.

100

I’m not the one making the claim. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. He’s admitted he has none.

100

When asked for evidence, he admits he has none. This is the same kind of answer you get from election deniers.

100

If you think they’re lying, find evidence. Without evidence, you’re just making things up. The OP admits he has no evidence.

200

I haven’t said anything that is wrong. Jay made a false claim and refuses to provide evidence for it. Period.

000

I am certain that no one has provided any evidence of Waymo violating their privacy policy and public statements that they do not share information with law enforcement unless compelled to do so by a court order. The OP admits he has no evidence to support his baseless claim:

000

It isn’t “well said”. You’re defending the exact same behavior as election deniers or the people who say COVID was a hoax. I haven’t been “called out” on anything. I am the one doing the calling out. You should be asking for evidence, not defending the lack of it.

100