iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

If you believe the journalist is wrong about the law, just piss off until you prove it. I'm not your research assistant.

100 1

You don't like the answer you've been given. Fair enough. Find your own

100 1

That is guidance hasn't been rejected or refused yet.

100 1

The EHRC has already provided guidance. Read it for anything else you want.

100 1

Transition your gender till the cows come home. No one cares. The law on service provision is based on your immutable sex.

100 1

It means when a sign says women's, it means no males. Simple

Actually the supreme court ruled it has always been biological since single sex provision was introduced in the Factory Act of 1901.

It's binary in law. That's all that matters in law.

110 1

You seem to be rather mistaken on where the country is on this subject

1121 12

As both the jolly fox batterer and a GC KC recently of the EHRC have pointed out, this story is an utter nothing burger.

010 1

Other sources like the Supreme Court?

000 0

The law remains sex based and has overwhelming popular support. (The guidance is actually irrelevant to the law)

100 1

None of which changes how the judgement of the Supreme Court will be implemented by the courts. The guidance isn't the law.

030 3

Gendered bathrooms would be unlawful. Single self contained rooms are the gold standard, not a gotcha.

130 3

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 22/01/2026

bsky.app/profile/elio...

041 4

Rutte has as much authority over Denmark as he does over the US 🙄

020 2

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 18/01/2026

That only seems to be the case in your head

020 2

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 18/01/2026

So explain why you believe the two issues are on a par in terms of women feeling comfortable. Women feel comfortable when they are safe.

150 5

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 18/01/2026

Aye you saying there is some form of relationship between being a black female and a trans identified male in terms of risk to, and thus comfort of women? Cos that sounds pretty damn racist from here.

140 4

The division is men and women. Not your faith based beliefs, but reality.

060 6

Has never ruled that single sex provision is unlawful

Men aren't the vulnerable ones here

040 4

They have been. The supreme court has ruled.

They have the right to get changed for work without a semi naked man asking them when they will be taking their clothes off. What exactly is your problem with that?

"the case concerned a work colleague who identifies as a woman" Known as a man, as defined by UK legislation

All males are expected to keep our of women's changing areas. No differences at all.

180 8

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 13/01/2026

That he is trans is of no relevance. The issue is his sex

150 5

No advocate for an indicted war criminal should be giving talks in schools 🤷

010 1

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 06/01/2026

We know. You keep putting in complaints. They keep throwing them out 🤷

030 3

Nope. Randoms with no link to the facility.

130 3

The swimmers didn't have a vote. It is not a membership org. Randoms had a vote

110 1

If a sign says women It means not males. In all cases.

130 3

They have a shite record. Truly abysmal They've got every call wrong in the field of sex and gender, without exception!

Alternatively, you could read what the experts who called it correct for over a decade & Indeed stood up at the SC and won their argument instead of a fox batterer who couldn't be bothered to make a submission 😂😂😂

100 1

The group that confidently told you that there was no chance of FWS victory at the SC and that you should continue funding FWS because they were embarrassing their own side? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

230 3

Here's the Equality Act on what is a legitimate single sex space. Read 6 and tell me that doesn't cover sanitary facilities 😂😂😂😂😂

100 1

The case was about that. The decision was unanimous. If the sign says women's, it means female only. All other interpretations are illegal 😂

220 2

Yep. You don't appear to understand how the law work and have no interest in understanding it. Anything that isn't single sex or unisex is unlawful.