iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 30/01/2026

Or K12 flick ”Slow and tame”

020

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 28/10/2025

Onkohan näistä veneistä ja salakuljettajista muuta todistusta, kuin nämä kuvat videot ja USA:n väittämä?

110

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 19/07/2025

I’ll help. Just ignore just about Trump says. He speaks bs just about much as putin does.

000

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 02/07/2025

Jaa’a… oliskohan tuossa ainesta hallintokanteluun?

090

Reposted by Vetus Flatus

Eliot Higgins @eliothiggins.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

Trump quoting an OSHIT account for confirmation of his strikes on Iran has a very special level of ick for me.

14571101

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

Kun tankkerit laittoivat transponderit pois päältä alkoi olla selvää minne matka suuntautuu. Ihan kuin Trump olisi ihan ite suunnitellut operaation. Hämmentävää ainakin oli, enkä muista toista vastaavaa tapausta.

000

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

Trumpin Strömsö-hetki. Monta päivää kerätty voimaa ja lopulta B-2 pommikoneiden lentoa pystyi seuraamaan livenä. Tiedettiin myös koneiden nousseen raskaasti kuormattuina. Arvioitu saapuminen Iraniin oli kympin aikaan illalla et 1.00 Suomen aikaa.

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 06/06/2025

He ketkä jo vaalien alla miettivät kuinka kauan menee Muskin ja trumpin egojen rajuun törmäämiseen ovat saaneet vastauksen.

000

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 08/05/2025

Mielenkiintoista joskin valitettavaa, mikäli tämä pitää paikkaansa. Kun nyt Ukrainassa on F-16 vs Su-35S mahdollista, tullaanko Pakistanin taivaalla näkemään Kiinalainen J-10C vs Rafale? Tai JF-17 vs Rafale? www.news18.com/amp/india/in...

news18.com

India Hits Islamabad, Lahore, Sialkot In Retaliation To Pakistan's Brazen Attack - News18

India struck Pakistan’s capital Islamabad as well as Lahore and Sialkot late on Thursday after thwarting multiple attacks on Indian cities, including Jammu, Jaisalmer and Pathankot

000

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 08/04/2025

Uusi video Kiinasta. Väitetty 6gen kone laskeutumassa.

000

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 24/03/2025

Oonko mä ainut kenen mielestä Ramses näyttää ihan Hesulin Ron Jeremyltä?

000

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 24/03/2025

Who would have guessed that in 2025 perhaps the biggest threat to eu security would be the USA! Ukraine has blocked the Russian threat, and China is not threatening militarily. Only USA provides military threat (not alliance!) to EU nations sovereign territory.

000

Reposted by Vetus Flatus

Jon Cooper @joncooper-us.bsky.social · 24/03/2025

🇬🇱 🇬🇱

737192475715

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 18/03/2025

miinojen käyttömahdollisuuden kiinteistörajoilla. Mutta heti kun nämä on koostettu yksiin kansiin ja käsitelty parlamentaarisessa järjestyksestä miinasopimuksesta voi myös Suomi erota.

020

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 18/03/2025

Pyydetään om lausunto Suomi-Venäjä ja Suomi-Kenia seurojen kielteiseen kantaan ja sen juridiseen kestävyyteen. Mannerheimin lastensuojelua kuullaan asiasta mahdollisten painajaisten estämismekanismeista ja Maanmittauslaitos tutkii

110

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 18/03/2025

Ja kiistelee sisäisesti siitä, raja tutkii tarpeen rajaturvallisuudesta ja rustailee lausunnon rauhanaikaisen käytön estämiseksi, tulli pohtii miinojen niiden tarpeiden ja tarpeiden ainesosien tuonti- ja vientimahdollisuudet, Suomi-Venäjäseuraa haastatellaan, kysytään om kanta ja

110

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 18/03/2025

Niin meilläkin. Kunhan nyt ensin päätetään työryhmän perustamisesta, päätetään tavasta ja lausunnosta, pyydetään moniammatilliset lausunnot ja kv politiikan uhkakuva-arviot, lähetystöt keskustelevat sidosryhmien kanssa, um ja pm on tekee saman omalla tahollaan, puolustusvoimat arviovat tarpeen

110

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 18/03/2025

Yllättäen ihan saatanasti muita jäljessä. Mikä ihme siinä voi kestää? Varsinkaan oikeistohallituksella, kun ei vasemmistopasifistitkaan ole jarruna? Toisaalta vasen laita tajusi semi nopeasti hakea natoon!😯

000

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 15/03/2025

Except that Portugal did not cancel the order. Unlike Canada, Portugal has never ordered the F-35.

000

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 15/03/2025

No NYT! Olisiko ollut Elonin vastaus heille jotka edelleen puolustelevat natsitervehdyksen olleen sydämellinen heippaus. Tässä vielä otsikko käännettynä, jos englanti ei taivu. www.nytimes.com/2025/03/14/t...

000

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 15/03/2025

Ihan ok artikkeli Iltasanomilta. Pikku stiplu tähänkin on kuitenkin taas saatu. Suomessa mainitaan olevan 280t reserviläistä. Meitä on oikeasti lähes 870t. Miksi sotilasasioista kirjoittaminen on niin vaikeaa? 🤔 www.is.fi/politiikka/a...

is.fi

Pärjäisivätkö Euroopan maat yksin Venäjää vastaan? Vertailu paljastaa yllättävän tiedon Suomesta

Saksa on noussut ajatushautomon raportin mukaan Euroopan keihäänkärjeksi. Suomen järjestelmä erottuu vertailussa edukseen.

010

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

Not surprising as the the country risk of US is enormously higher than it was a few months ago. Even release of source code to tier 1 partners or even to all users to reduce fear of the kill switch does not remove Trump's Usa-related country risk.

010

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 11/03/2025

Now there is something more or at least gathered in single article. bsky.app/profile/blas...

000

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 11/03/2025

For me, Avionist is the best description. I disagree most with Schranzhofer. He has his points, but they don't imply a complete grounding of the machine. They do affect availability and especially survivability, but they do not prevent use in a low-threat scenario.

000

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 11/03/2025

So many European countries say there is no switch. Lockheed is more cautious in its statements, but stresses the autonomous capability of the aircraft. Although what else would you expect?

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 11/03/2025

These are just my simplified translations. Some more detailed so I So I recommend you translate the article. Few of my own points below.

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 11/03/2025

The Avionist compares F-35 to a smart phone that wont stop working but runs into troubles without new updates.

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 11/03/2025

Germanys Schranzhofer puts it it bit different: ”The job is handled much more simply through the flight mission planning system. Then the fighter immediately stays on the ground, says Schranzhofer in the Bild article.”

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 11/03/2025

LM also refers to a statement by the Belgian armed forces commander that "we have no indication that the plane could be remotely controlled".

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 11/03/2025

Switzerlands ministry DDPS corrected its statement. Now it sais that plane can’t be remotely controlled and they can use plane and missiles for its defence without promision from US. By DDPS they can do it independently when ever they want.

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 11/03/2025

Finnish mod say that there is no single kill switch that prevents the use of the jet. However updates and maintenance will make vital dependance.

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 11/03/2025

I think Canada already is the greatest american nation

0120

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 11/03/2025

Hyvä määritelmä termille ”counter productive”.

010

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 11/03/2025

Jos uni ei meinaa tulla, ehkä hyvät uutiset rentouttavat. Musk on köyhtynyt jo 121miljardia. Vielä on matkaa pohjalle, mutta suunta on oikea ja vauhti napakka.

000

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

These things just can’t be run in 4year periods. I further argue that no one (maybe except of Germany) should not go for F-35 as a new user at the moment, and europe should invest much more in own 6gen jets and develop indigenous systems apart from US.

000

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

So in the end, who knows which systems can be circumvented and which are the ultimate paralyze to the use of the jet or the jet itself. I take it clear that loss of US support is fatal of operating F-35.At least in long term. I also argue that who has them can’t rapidly replace them,nor should they

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

Finally the wild card. 10years ago, who would’ve guessed seeing HARM fired from Migs? Or 50years ago that Iran is still flying F-14? Russia is still flying western jetliners too etc.

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

So building the switch would have been huge economical, political and military risk. The gamble that can be won other ways without risking it all. Keep in mind the fact that F-35 is not open for everyone to buy and buyers are and will be commited to partnership anyway, already being allies.

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

Having given few thoughts, there propably is some systems, or even whole jet that will require regular connection to ALIS/ODIN to work. But I don’t consider it as a switch anymore than some computer worm planted with the update.

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

If you consider removal of OEM support as the kill switch, then there definetly is one. For sure. Like Justin Bronk wisely said ”there definetly is dependance”, well there is, and it is major one in the case of F-35.

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

After all, things like ALIS/ODIN and its requirement of connectivity is publicly known fact and so is data sharing and analyzing. Things that has also been disgussed while HX program was ongoing.

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

In the digital (not to mention AI) era OEM support is the key in just about anything (I bet Ford can cripple my Mach E in anytime). It didn’t even come in my mind that someone could think operating worlds most advanced jet without OEM support for extended periods of time is possible.

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

If there is the switch, how would’ve those partners reacted knowledge of if it leaks? Back off from funding and help of design and build? Canceling the program would’ve then been real possibility. Trillion dollars would’ve been wasted.

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

Lets say China hacks it for example. They simply turn of majority of US airforce, Navy and Marine jets? In the other hand, everyone operating the plane is already tied into the US. In smaller scale it is so with even with older planes like F-16, F-15 and F-18. Irans F-14 being anomaly.

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

However, I can be wrong, but I don’t believe there is one. Simple question is why would they have build one? Without US support jet can’t be used anyway, it’s not open just for any country to buy and what if its hacked?

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

US ability to get already known to be expencive program to the goal was debendant for these parters to help and partly fund the program. Keeping source code all by itself, was major issue back in the days. It also makes kill switch or development of the switch possible.

100

Vetus Flatus @blaster79.bsky.social · 10/03/2025

F-35 or JSF program was too big for US to handle by itself to begin with. So there were several close allies as tier1 partners. Partnerships eventually growing to levels 2 and 3.

100