Sign in

Arvid Ågren

@arvidagren.bsky.social
1.6K followers 479 following 783 posts

Evolutionary biologist. Assistant Professor CCLCM/CWRU. The Gene’s-Eye View of Evolution(OUP 2021) and The Paradox of the Organism (HUP 2025). www.arvidagren.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
John Maynard Smith was also approached to review it, but declined because he was drowning in work following a bout of flu.
242
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Thanks for the guesses! The answer is getting a first in Greats (Literae humaniores, the university's classics degree).
100
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
THURSDAY TRIVIA What accomplishment of JBS Haldane did Peter Medawar describe as “the most prestigious thing an Oxford undergraduate could do”?
120
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
Great week in Oxford celebrating the 50th anniversary of The Selfish Gene.
1181
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Archive of the day.
030
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
The Royal Oak on Woodstock Road in Oxford. Where in early April 1976 Richard Dawkins met Walter Bodmer and Glenys Thomson, the two reviewers OUP had asked to assess The Selfish Gene, to go over their comments on the manuscript.
1152
Reposted by Arvid Ågren
Journal of Evolutionary Biology @jevbio.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
Can selfish genetic elements get away with their selfishness? This depends on ecology of their host organisms. Under certain conditions, selfish genetic elements may spread virtually unopposed by selection: doi.org/10.1093/jeb/... @martijnschenkel.bsky.social @arvidagren.bsky.social & M. Patten
doi.org
The ecological theatre of selfish elements
Abstract. Some selfish genetic elements enhance their transmission to the next generation by interfering with and eliminating competing variants within the
0188
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
This is a super exciting opportunity!
020
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
“Maynard Smith, perhaps more than any other single individual, has embraced both major strategies of explanation of evolutionary change: the formal theory of population genetics, including natural selection; and the phenotypic theory of adaptations.”
1110
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
Not everyone was impressed. Here is Bryan Clarke in Science.
160
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
Gabby Dover letter to the editor of The Independent 24 March 1993.
Sir: There are two classes of questions: natural and unnatural. Can science answer both of them? No, science cannot answer the question why Dr Dawkins is unnaturally drawn to theology like a moth to a flame. Only theology can answer that and it has a lot to answer for.

Yours faithfully,

GABRIEL A. DOVER

University of Leicester
121
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
Thanks for all the guesses! The answer is Richard Lewontin’s 'The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change', published by Columbia University Press in 1974.
160
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
TUESDAY TRIVIA
Jim Crow once wrote of a university press that "they should have their wrists slapped for a blurb on the cover which says the book 'will surely become one of the landmarks of twentieth century science.' After all, this is not The Origin of Species. It is just a thoughtful, readable, and very stimulating book." 

What was the book in question?
330
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
Laurence Hurst on doing theory with Bill Hamilton.
Screenshot from p. 94 reading "My own model was fine and tractable, but my nomenclature was utterly dreadful, he remarked. Coming from the author of the paper with the most impossible nomenclature,²⁰ this was pretty severe criticism."
130
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
"An organism is less like a machine and more like a body politic, rife with internal conflict and opposing factions." New essay in Science and Politics with Manus Patten. sciencepolitics.org/2026/08/24/o...
sciencepolitics.org
Our Bodies Are Not Machines - Science Politics
Organisms are less like optimized Swiss watches and more like a messy collection of political factions.
040
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 26/08/2026
Why grouping intralocus and interlocus phenomena under one umbrella of “sexual conflict” is a mistake. Insightful paper from @imprintedgene.bsky.social, @andygardner.bsky.social y.social, Tracey Chapman, and @jennyperry.bsky.social yperry.bsky.social. royalsocietypublishing.org/rspb/article...
royalsocietypublishing.org
Sexual conflict and sexual pleiotropy
Abstract. Natural selection might favour brightly coloured males and drab females. A male and a female might disagree about whether to mate. Such tensions
12514
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
John Krebs on the remarkable, persistent, and emotional divide over the concept of adaptation in evolutionary biology.
280
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
Can’t wait for this series! PPF is one of the most exciting podcasts out there, and Nikhil Krishnan wrote my favourite book of the last few years.
191
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 18/08/2026
New paper with Nick Davies and Kevin Foster in @natcomms.nature.com. We show that often neither selection against transposons’ deleterious effects nor exploitation by parasitic elements is sufficient to keep them in control. Only active host suppression does. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
07927
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 18/08/2026
I’m no Solnit or Dawkins, but on the eve of its American publication I too want join the chorus of celebration of this wonderful book.
3217
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 17/08/2026
Another nice paper for our @jevbio.bsky.social special issue on internal conflicts: "Fetal microchimeric cells: Today’s enemies, tomorrow’s friends" By Francisco Úbeda and @geoffwild.bsky.social. academic.oup.com/jeb/advance-...
0106
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
Mary Jane West-Eberhard's on debating and listening at conferences. From her Evolution review of 'Current Problems in Sociobiology' edited by the King's College Sociobiology Group (CUP 1982)
1111
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
Nice intro to special series on selfish genetic elements in Genetics and G3 academic.oup.com/g3journal/ar...
academic.oup.com
Highlighting the genetics of natural and synthetic selfish elements in a special GENETICS and G3 series
Recognizing the broad importance of selfish elements, the GSA journals have established a series to highlight the genetic mechanisms and evolutionary conse
032
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 07/08/2026
*NEW PAPER* On why selfish elements thrive when ecological conditions permit soft selection. With @martijnschenkel.bsky.social and Manus Patten. Now available for early view on @jevbio.bsky.social. academic.oup.com/jeb/advance-...
academic.oup.com
The Ecological Theatre of Selfish Elements
Abstract. Some selfish genetic elements enhance their transmission to the next generation by interfering with and eliminating competing variants within the
02012
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 06/08/2026
A few weeks after The Selfish Gene was published, Kenny took part in an event with Dawkins at Balliol organised by Denis Noble. There, he is said to have mocked the idea of replicators by asking Dawkins: “If all I knew about English was its alphabet, how could I possibly understand Shakespeare?”
182
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 04/08/2026
Whither maladaptation? @imprintedgene.bsky.social reviews Philip Madgwick's 'Maladaptation: Natural Selection in the Wrong Direction?' for BioScience. academic.oup.com/bioscience/a...
academic.oup.com
Adaptation: the good, the bad, and the ugly
Organisms appear remarkably well designed to live their lives. A seal, which seems all waddle and blubber on land, is transformed when it enters the water.
083
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 03/08/2026
Does anyone know of a good updated figure likes this showing the correlation between transposons and genome size? No taxa preference. @transposableman.bsky.social?
177
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 02/08/2026
First Monday of August tomorrow.
161
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 30/07/2026
Another example: Ernst Mayr not being happy with sharing the Crafoord Prize with George Williams. Remembered by David Haig.
220
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 30/07/2026
OUP's Michael Rodgers (who published The Selfish Gene) once tried to get John Maynard Smith to write Haldane's biography. JMS decline, but instead offered him The Major Transitions in Evolution.
151
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 30/07/2026
Gabby Dover proposing a 'symbolic glass of champagne' to Sydney Brenner for the decline of 'replicator selection'.
130
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
Amartya Sen, Garry Runciman, Ian Hacking... and Richard Dawkins. Quite the line up for 1979-1980 lecture programme for the British Society for the Philosophy of Science.
021
Reposted by Arvid Ågren
Ben Allen @evodynamics.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
Under what conditions can the evolutionary interests of a gene differ from those of their host organism? Very cool conceptual/mathematical synthesis here!
2145
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 28/07/2026
Michael Singer tries to get a job back in England after doing his PhD at Stanford.
140
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 26/07/2026
Can the stature of a prize be diminished by its recipients? Sewall Wright thought less of the Balzac Prize after learning that Ernst Mayr had also received it.
561
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
New preprint: 'Internal evolutionary conflicts: a conceptual synthesis and mathematical primer' Really fun collaboration with @gauravathreya.bsky.social, @shikharabhat.bsky.social, @yagmurerten.bsky.social, and @tom-is-kean.bsky.social. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
biorxiv.org
Internal evolutionary conflicts: a conceptual synthesis and mathematical primer
Internal evolutionary conflicts arise when elements within an organism have diverging fitness interests. Examples range from meiotic drive and cytoplasmic male sterility to transposable elements and s...
1135
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
Today is the 5th anniversary of The Gene's-Eye View of Evolution. Writing it was one of the most fun and intellectual rewarding experiences of my career so far. Very thankful to everyone who has read, discussed, taught, reviewed, and recommended it over the past five years.
A hand holds a copy of The Gene’s-Eye View of Evolution against a sunset sky, with green trees, a grassy lawn, and an outdoor staircase in the background.
1231
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
Keep an eye out for this fun paper!
030
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
What did E.B. Ford do during World War 2?
120
Reposted by Arvid Ågren
Matthew Cobb @matthewcobb.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
Dawkinsian precision here from Thomson (1908) @arvidagren.bsky.social
172
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 15/07/2026
In 1982, the final year exam in zoology at Oxford contained the following question: ”Assess the contribution of E.B. Ford to genetics.” Afterwards, Ford was asked for his own view on the question. This was his answer:
162
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 14/07/2026
Many good guesses (including @timcoulson.bsky.social!). The answer is Arthur Cain.
100
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 14/07/2026
Hint: It was said of him that "On his good days he could charm anybody and on his bad days he could offend anybody".
300
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 14/07/2026
TUESDAY TRIVIA What Fellow of the Royal Society wrote a biography of Erasmus Darwin, had it rejected by two publishers for containing too many quotations, and, in a huff, decided not to publish it but instead deposited the manuscript in the University of Liverpool library where it still is?
010
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 13/07/2026
And here is @andygardner.bsky.social's nice contribution to the same @jevbio.bsky.social special issue on internal conflicts: academic.oup.com/jeb/advance-...
academic.oup.com
Inclusive fitness for the conflicted individual
Abstract. The theory of inclusive fitness explains the process and purpose of social adaptation. However, the canonical derivation of inclusive fitness ass
1153
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 10/07/2026
Do interactions between different selfish genetic elements matter? Great paper by Jonathan Wilson and Nina Wedell for our forthcoming special issue on internal conflicts for @jevbio.bsky.social. academic.oup.com/jeb/advance-...
academic.oup.com
062
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
Ford is often described as a misogynist, and there are plenty of stories to back that up. Perhaps ironically, then, he owed his All Souls fellowship to MR putting his name forward. That is why, for the the first few years in college, he was known as ‘Mrs Lane’s fellow’.
200
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 07/07/2026
Miriam Rothschild meets E.B. Ford for the first time.
100
Arvid Ågren @arvidagren.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
Charles Elton on not getting along with Julian Huxley.
280