iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Anmol Goel

Parameter Lab @parameterlab.bsky.social · 03/02/2026

‼️New paper from Parameter Lab! ⛓️‍💥 We identify privacy collapse, a silent failure mode of LLMs: LLMs fine-tuned on seemingly benign data can lose their ability to respect contextual privacy norms. Done by @anmolgoel.bsky.social during his internship! Check-out 👇

051 5

Reposted by Anmol Goel

Martin Gubri @mgubri.bsky.social · 03/02/2026

New paper out!🎉 One of our most surprising findings: fine-tuning an LLM on debugging code has unexpected side-effects on contextual privacy. The model learns from printing variables that internal state are ok to share, then generalises this to social situations🤯 A🧵below👇

072 7

Anmol Goel @anmolgoel.bsky.social · 03/02/2026

For more insights: 🌐 Project page: parameterlab.github.io/privacy-coll... 📄 Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2601.15220 Work done with the amazing team at @parameterlab.bsky.social, Cornelius Emde, Sangdoo Yun, @coallaoh.bsky.social and @mgubri.bsky.social #NLProc #AISafety #Privacy #LLMs

parameterlab.github.io

Privacy Collapse | ACL Submission

030 3

Anmol Goel @anmolgoel.bsky.social · 03/02/2026

Privacy collapse can even be selectively activated. We show backdoored fine-tuning where models behave normally, until a specific trigger induces systematic privacy leakage.

120 2

Anmol Goel @anmolgoel.bsky.social · 03/02/2026

Mechanistic analysis shows privacy is uniquely fragile: • Privacy representations live in late layers • Fine-tuning selectively erodes privacy-relevant representations, affecting the model's confidence in privacy-preserving answers. • Task-relevant features stay intact.

100 1

Anmol Goel @anmolgoel.bsky.social · 03/02/2026

This happens in the wild. Fine-tuning on tasks like empathy (EmpatheticDialogues) or customer support (TweetSumm) consistently degrades privacy. Pure reasoning data (e.g. GSM8K) does not, suggesting that certain characteristics in the data cause this collapse.

100 1

Anmol Goel @anmolgoel.bsky.social · 03/02/2026

Optimizing for proactive helpfulness alone can cause massive privacy degradation. Across 6 models, agentic privacy drops by up to 98%! Privacy collapse is not inherent to fine-tuning, since the privacy of our control fine-tuned models remains stable.

100 1

Anmol Goel @anmolgoel.bsky.social · 03/02/2026

This failure is silent. Fine-tuned models still look “healthy” on: • safety benchmarks • general capabilities Yet privacy collapses. Current evaluations miss this entirely.

100 1

Anmol Goel @anmolgoel.bsky.social · 03/02/2026

Privacy collapse is not caused by malicious attacks. It emerges from diverse, seemingly benign characteristics in standard fine-tuning datasets, like: • helpfulness • emotional engagement • customer support • debugging code

100 1

Anmol Goel @anmolgoel.bsky.social · 03/02/2026

Models lose the ability to reason about when information should not be shared, even though: • training data is high-quality • training data contains no explicit privacy violations • standard safety benchmarks still pass

100 1

Anmol Goel @anmolgoel.bsky.social · 03/02/2026

🚨 Fine-tuning your model to be more helpful or empathetic might be making it less private, without you noticing. In our latest work, we show that benign fine-tuning can silently break contextual privacy in language models while safety & general capabilities appear intact. ⬇️

140 4

Reposted by Anmol Goel

UKP Lab @ukplab.bsky.social · 27/01/2025

#ICLR »Differentially Private Steering for Large Language Model Alignment« by @anmolgoel.bsky.social, Yaxi Hu, Iryna Gurevych (@igurevych.bsky.social) & Amartya Sanyal (@amartyasanyal.bsky.social) (2/🧵)

163 6

Anmol Goel @anmolgoel.bsky.social · 24/11/2024

This is super impactful work! Congratulations!

130 3

Reposted by Anmol Goel

Christoph Molnar @christophmolnar.bsky.social · 22/11/2024

Just realized BlueSky allows sharing valuable stuff cause it doesn't punish links. 🤩 Let's start with "What are embeddings" by @vickiboykis.com The book is a great summary of embeddings, from history to modern approaches. The best part: it's free. Link: vickiboykis.com/what_are_emb...

Over the past decade, embeddings — numerical representations of
machine learning features used as input to deep learning models — have
become a foundational data structure in industrial machine learning
systems. TF-IDF, PCA, and one-hot encoding have always been key tools
in machine learning systems as ways to compress and make sense of
large amounts of textual data. However, traditional approaches were
limited in the amount of context they could reason about with increasing
amounts of data. As the volume, velocity, and variety of data captured
by modern applications has exploded, creating approaches specifically
tailored to scale has become increasingly important.
Google’s Word2Vec paper made an important step in moving from
simple statistical representations to semantic meaning of words. The
subsequent rise of the Transformer architecture and transfer learning, as
well as the latest surge in generative methods has enabled the growth
of embeddings as a foundational machine learning data structure. This
survey paper aims to provide a deep dive into what embeddings are,
their history, and usage patterns in industry.

22647101 647

Reposted by Anmol Goel

Chen Cecilia Liu @ccliu.bsky.social · 21/11/2024

Sorry that I’m missing a lot of people. If you’re working on making NLP models more culturally aware, please DM me to be added. go.bsky.app/tRMpng

2123 12

Reposted by Anmol Goel

Amartya Sanyal @amartyasanyal.bsky.social · 21/11/2024

I made a starter pack for european researchers interested in some aspects of learning theory. The list is clearly inexhaustive. So please enter your suggestions in comments. go.bsky.app/5o5uVnr

1122 12