Sign in

Andrea Dittadi

@andreadittadi.bsky.social
73 followers 65 following 5 posts

postdoc at Helmholtz AI & TUM | diffusion/flows & (causal) representation learning | previously DTU Copenhagen, MPI Tübingen, Microsoft Research, Amazon addtt.github.io

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Andrea Dittadi
Beatrix M. G. Nielsen @beatrixmgn.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
I am happy to announce that our article "When Does Closeness in Distribution Imply Representational Similarity? An Identifiability Perspective" has been accepted at NeurIPS 2025! 🎉 arxiv.org/abs/2506.037... Details below 👇
arxiv.org
When Does Closeness in Distribution Imply Representational Similarity? An Identifiability Perspective
When and why representations learned by different deep neural networks are similar is an active research topic. We choose to address these questions from the perspective of identifiability theory, whi...
181
Andrea Dittadi @andreadittadi.bsky.social · 06/12/2024
This was a very interesting and insightful project led by @beatrixmgn.bsky.social, with invaluable help from identifiability expert Luigi Gresele. This is such a promising area, and there's so much more to explore. Come chat with us at our poster at the @unireps.bsky.social workshop! end/
020
Andrea Dittadi @andreadittadi.bsky.social · 06/12/2024
2) The representations of models with different likelihoods are related by a linear transformations, plus an "error" term which we found to depend on differences of log likelihoods. This error can be substantial even if the models' losses are arbitrarily close to optimal! 4/
120
Andrea Dittadi @andreadittadi.bsky.social · 06/12/2024
The main issue is that the assumption of equal likelihood rarely holds in practice. This is because the loss being optimized is the expected negative log likelihood over the data distribution, and: 1) Equal loss does not imply equal likelihood. 3/
120
Andrea Dittadi @andreadittadi.bsky.social · 06/12/2024
Current identifiability results tell us that, for a broad class of models (including e.g. classifiers and autoregressive language models), those defining the same likelihood p(y|x) have representations that are equal up to a linear transformation. 2/
120
Andrea Dittadi @andreadittadi.bsky.social · 06/12/2024
Why do NNs often learn similar representations? Existing identifiability results offer theoretical insights, but applying them in practice poses challenges. We’ll present our new work exploring these challenges next week at @unireps #NeurIPS2024 🇨🇦🎉 openreview.net/pdf?id=SQKUZSieVg 1/
openreview.net
1122