Sign in

alyaza ΘΔ

@alyazabirze.bsky.social
834 followers 172 following 5.4K posts

part time coyote, full time gryphon || 24 || nonbinary. they/she/it || ΘΔ coyote || you could say i'm here under protest || alyaza.neocities.org

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by alyaza ΘΔ
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 6h
soliciting interest in (& taking submissions for) the proof-of-concept issue of COYOTE, a quarter-page (4.25in×5.5in or 10.795 cm×13.97 cm) zine of all things therian, alterhuman, and questioning of the hegemony of human experience information & submission sheet: docs.google.com/document/d/1...
COYOTE: a mission statement and manifesto

COYOTE, at its simplest, is a zine of therian, alterhuman, and human-questioning artistry and expression; and yet, much like the multitudinous animal from which it takes its name, it aspires to much more than this description suggests. it is a forum that provides the greater alterhuman community the seriousness we deserve; but also a festival that promises us space for revelry and joy; and a front for our collective liberation from an otherwise indifferent world. whether through spirited polemic or avant garde poetry—contemplative fiction or creative non-fiction—COYOTE is a communal work which utilizes every weapon in a collective arsenal to combat the chauvinistic notion that humanity is all there ever is or can be.

COYOTE is multivariate in its influences: it takes after the affable animal itself, which has prevailed and proliferated in spite of its intense persecution; the trickster deity long described by Indigenous folklore, who can never quite be satisfied with things as they are even when this spells trouble for themselves; and the queer sex work activists who before our time took COYOTE as the name for their own cause, handing a voice to the voiceless and power to the powerless. COYOTE embodies each of these moments and more, and stands for the fullest realization of what they embody in our lifetime. call off your tired old ethics!

above all, COYOTE attempts to evoke purposeful emotion in a time where our attention is endlessly exploited, and speak sense in a space rife with senseless slop. we want to explore everything which is adventurous; joyous; provocative; and especially subversive—and we want to do so with intention. we think this is the only legacy befitting of an animal once called our continent's ‘original Bolshevik.’

just as the coyote echoes its cry across this continent, COYOTE too echoes the cry of liberation that came before:

come out, you of therian expression!
22217
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 6h
i always feel so in over my head doing this stuff, but i suppose there's not really a way to get over that except by doing it. anyways i must not fear, fear is the mind killer. but also: it is scary to not know if you are about to be inundated by interest in something
040
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 6h
soliciting interest in (& taking submissions for) the proof-of-concept issue of COYOTE, a quarter-page (4.25in×5.5in or 10.795 cm×13.97 cm) zine of all things therian, alterhuman, and questioning of the hegemony of human experience information & submission sheet: docs.google.com/document/d/1...
COYOTE: a mission statement and manifesto

COYOTE, at its simplest, is a zine of therian, alterhuman, and human-questioning artistry and expression; and yet, much like the multitudinous animal from which it takes its name, it aspires to much more than this description suggests. it is a forum that provides the greater alterhuman community the seriousness we deserve; but also a festival that promises us space for revelry and joy; and a front for our collective liberation from an otherwise indifferent world. whether through spirited polemic or avant garde poetry—contemplative fiction or creative non-fiction—COYOTE is a communal work which utilizes every weapon in a collective arsenal to combat the chauvinistic notion that humanity is all there ever is or can be.

COYOTE is multivariate in its influences: it takes after the affable animal itself, which has prevailed and proliferated in spite of its intense persecution; the trickster deity long described by Indigenous folklore, who can never quite be satisfied with things as they are even when this spells trouble for themselves; and the queer sex work activists who before our time took COYOTE as the name for their own cause, handing a voice to the voiceless and power to the powerless. COYOTE embodies each of these moments and more, and stands for the fullest realization of what they embody in our lifetime. call off your tired old ethics!

above all, COYOTE attempts to evoke purposeful emotion in a time where our attention is endlessly exploited, and speak sense in a space rife with senseless slop. we want to explore everything which is adventurous; joyous; provocative; and especially subversive—and we want to do so with intention. we think this is the only legacy befitting of an animal once called our continent's ‘original Bolshevik.’

just as the coyote echoes its cry across this continent, COYOTE too echoes the cry of liberation that came before:

come out, you of therian expression!
22217
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 9h
this is not the thing i was going to announce (*that* should be forthcoming later today?) but a minimum viable zine format for my essays is finally done!! still iterating on it--am getting a friend to trial print it today--but in the near future you should be able to physically experience my work :)
Scribus layout for my essay zine
130
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 23h
Coyote vs. Acme: a very good movie :)
050
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 03/10/2026
it seems problematic that we have no organized movement to sustain subcultural initiatives, and we're kind of just all playing it by ear when it seems plausible that a community institution will croak—someone should write about doing something about this...
1150
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
sometimes you write what you feel is a really good poem but you can’t share it with anyone because it would be incredibly obvious who the poem is about. today is such a day
030
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
today on birzeblog: two years have passed since Cohost closed; two years of Cohost realism have, in turn, set in. it is now easier to imagine the end of the internet than it is to imagine another website with the promise or possibility that was offered by Cohost. alyaza.neocities.org#cohost
alyaza.neocities.org
birzeblog: homepage
03210
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
coyotes are allowed to sleep and dream of something beautiful
050
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
There's more like me where I come from / So mark our shapes / Go down to the netherworld / Plant grapes
000
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
i can't believe it but: finally, it looks like all 11 essays in what i'm calling my "zine" project are actually done!! (minus another round of editing) provisionally, i have them at 11,458 words—which is, uh, a lot. a lot more than i expected this to be when i started it. formatting will be fun...
040
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
debout, les damnés de la terre . . .
030
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
i think my axiomatic belief about crime and prisons is simple: i believe punishment should be levied with the goal of ultimate betterment, not for its own sake. to hit people with a stick basically never makes them better, it just makes them superficially play along so you don't hit them again
1120
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
anyways, back to work being a coyote
040
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
i think a problem here is a lot of you want a justice system which induces catharsis rather than a justice system which strives for positive outcomes—and you fail to realize that justice in service of catharsis is usually deeply reactionary and conservative rather than constructive and progressive
2427
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ but socially and carcerally: i don't think the vast majority of people who are rapists will stop perpetrating harm if you totally socially marginalize them or throw them in a box for 30 years. any large-scale "harm reduction" in my mind requires changing our culture and system of justice
1110
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
i do find it interesting to mull what exactly a "restorative" approach to someone in the current, specific circumstances of Jacob Geller—a microcelebrity with a decent audience perpetrating one (leniently punished) act of sexual assault ten years ago—is, could, or would actually be in practice
2260
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
now that we have clear corroboration that Geller was punished for *some* sexual misconduct through a document that has been publicly available since 2020, the way this was initially disclosed (almost certainly without the victim's consent, and definitely without care) is that much more infuriating
090
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
sometimes i think about how, currently, any legacy i have will probably be from writing Cohost So White; and i am unsure how to feel about this.
040
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
this is as nice as i can be about this subject: i need you to understand and recognize how absurdly fucked up it is to, in effect, believe that victims of sexual harm are allowed to be potentially revictimized by people around them on the utilitarian basis of marking somebody as a "potential danger"
1110
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
It always was a shock entering the straight world of a car full of grim people sitting dumbly with suffering on their faces and in their bodies, and their minds in their prisons. . . — John Giorno, “You Got to Burn to Shine”
000
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
that Jacob Geller sexual assault allegation floating around looks pretty plausible even based on what little has been shared so far—but i really do not like that this allegation is seemingly being brought forward without the consent of (or, frankly, sensitivity for) the apparent victim
2391
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
the world began in Cohost and ended at Bluesky
0131
Reposted by alyaza ΘΔ
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
problems of the .furry TLD: an essay on my dislike of this idea and the rhetoric behind it alyaza.neocities.org#dotfurry
there are a variety of problems—or, perhaps, just one big problem with many facets—that sour the concept and rhetoric behind the .furry TLD for me.

i would like to start with the fact that to speak of communities “forced to hop from platform to platform, bending to the whims of those seeking to profit from their engagement” and therefore assert the need for “digital sovereignty within our community” is to make a political statement. and yet for all the truth underlying this statement, the people behind the current .furry TLD do not seem to actually grapple with the politics that should follow from it—or even recognize that this is a political statement in the first place, requiring political interventions to fully realize. rather, it seems that the .furry TLD is being stewarded by a governing body with an with an essentially laissez-faire, apolitical attitude despite the fact that it also represents something that has potential to become load-bearing subcultural infrastructure.

this is a possibility that, frankly, should scare the shit out of all of us.

consider this question, for example: ‘digital sovereignty’ on whose terms? it is well and good to be a “community-rooted organization” or to be “for furries, by furries”—but what do these practically mean for the subculture and its participants? because here we are speaking of a project asked to represent the totality of our subculture while also holding a de facto natural monopoly and a de facto captive market. there can, for all intents and purposes, be only one .furry TLD stewarded by one governing organization—and this TLD and its governing organization consequently inherits an immense coercive and definitional power over what is and is not legitimized as ‘furry,’ whether it actively and consciously chooses to wield these powers or not. does this not seem like something whose governing body should be democratically and collectively accountable to the subculture? [...]more to the point, who deserves representation in the decision-making of this “community-rooted organization”—who actually falls under this slogan of “for furries, by furries”—and who pointedly does not? which aspects of ‘the community’ will actually have a place in .furry and its governance, and which will be deprioritized or cast aside? or will ‘the community’ even have a place or a say in the current and future governance of the TLD—will it instead be, as Jo Freeman might put it, a structure of “the strong [and] the lucky” who happened to move first?

what i am getting at here is that “apolitical” infrastructure and governance is a contradiction in terms. even supposing this was not the case, however, i would still completely reject the notion that either infrastructure or governance can remain “apolitical” when they also serve the role of gatekeeper—when they assume a place in our subculture where their decisions could, would, and in some respects already do exert influence over defining what is and is not subculturally legitimized—like a .furry TLD would and does. the .furry TLD, then, is a result of political choices. how it has structured itself and who it listens to is a political choice. and in fact, consequential political choices about the nature of our subculture—and about what or who we are willing to accept as within its bounds—are not only being made through its structure as we speak, but in some cases have already been made. these decisions, worse, are being made by a handful of actors who seem to not even realize they are effectively making such decisions on our collective behalf.case in point: i, personally, question the value of allowing “entities outside of our community” into the .furry TLD tent when so many of these entities are motivated by (and actively advancing) the very same profit-seeking rentier capitalism that is currently marginalizing our subculture in the first place! might we not be inviting the wolves into our henhouse with a decision like this, in the process subverting many of the benefits of having a TLD for ourselves? and yet it seems the question has already been settled for good: in the future, you or i will exist alongside them (and whatever consequences they bring with them), because the handful of people involved with the .furry TLD intend to allow outside entities on grounds of financial expedience.

more broadly, though, i think we must be incredibly wary of technological projects which—in this internet interregnum at least—fail to realize (much less name or consider) the social and political implications of their work, or the potential consequences of that work. we currently live in an ill-conceived technological regime which did not care to mull such questions—and the harm this (often willful) ignorance has caused in both online and offline spaces is almost impossible to overstate. this is not to imply, of course, that the .furry TLD could ever rise to a level of harm perpetrated by, say, Facebook or Elon Musk; but all the same, just because the .furry TLD is motivated by benevolence does not allow it to simply ignore these questions or avoid preempting their possible harms!individual benevolence, in any case, is no substitute for informed, collective decision-making and accountability; and this is certainly true with respect to speaking for and representing an entire, diverse subculture. if this is actually a project “for furries”—for ‘the community’—and its many interests, then it only seems fair for this asserted community to take an active role in the project's governance and affairs (rather than just retroactively and passively being offered a seat in the building).

i would finally note that in abdicating the level of power described here to a handful of actors who are largely unaccountable, we court future catastrophe and future regret. absent a structure which can be held collectively accountable we lose the ability to, in the words of Jo Freeman, "demand that those who do exercise power and influence be responsible for it"—and time and time again we see the consequences of losing this ability. if FurAffinity, for example, makes a bad editorial decision—as it has many times—there is no serious recourse except hoping something changes at the top. what will remedy our collective enclosure; our commodification; our exploitation is not simply changing who does these things from a non-furry to a furry—no, this can only come when we organize cooperative and democratic institutions, structured around communal participation and accountability and with a clear political vision for achieving and defending our subcultural interests as furries.
1186
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
I MET GOD SHE’S A YINGLET* * or, from another perspective, a yanglet
2110
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
coyotl
070
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
hoping to finish my final essay for my zine thing this week—i have finally been struck by inspiration in terms of framing this last essay—and as things currently stand i would expect the final product to be ~11,000 words, about 1,000 per essay. then we'll figure out formatting and uh. distribution
000
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
having a brain blast right now about furry stigma and shame
000
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
if there is some requirement that the .furry TLD be fundamentally hierarchical with no wiggle room for how it's run because of ICANN, then that's even less reason for it to be created and even more reason to question its creation and the political implications of thoughtlessly creating it
180
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
problems of the .furry TLD: an essay on my dislike of this idea and the rhetoric behind it alyaza.neocities.org#dotfurry
there are a variety of problems—or, perhaps, just one big problem with many facets—that sour the concept and rhetoric behind the .furry TLD for me.

i would like to start with the fact that to speak of communities “forced to hop from platform to platform, bending to the whims of those seeking to profit from their engagement” and therefore assert the need for “digital sovereignty within our community” is to make a political statement. and yet for all the truth underlying this statement, the people behind the current .furry TLD do not seem to actually grapple with the politics that should follow from it—or even recognize that this is a political statement in the first place, requiring political interventions to fully realize. rather, it seems that the .furry TLD is being stewarded by a governing body with an with an essentially laissez-faire, apolitical attitude despite the fact that it also represents something that has potential to become load-bearing subcultural infrastructure.

this is a possibility that, frankly, should scare the shit out of all of us.

consider this question, for example: ‘digital sovereignty’ on whose terms? it is well and good to be a “community-rooted organization” or to be “for furries, by furries”—but what do these practically mean for the subculture and its participants? because here we are speaking of a project asked to represent the totality of our subculture while also holding a de facto natural monopoly and a de facto captive market. there can, for all intents and purposes, be only one .furry TLD stewarded by one governing organization—and this TLD and its governing organization consequently inherits an immense coercive and definitional power over what is and is not legitimized as ‘furry,’ whether it actively and consciously chooses to wield these powers or not. does this not seem like something whose governing body should be democratically and collectively accountable to the subculture? [...]more to the point, who deserves representation in the decision-making of this “community-rooted organization”—who actually falls under this slogan of “for furries, by furries”—and who pointedly does not? which aspects of ‘the community’ will actually have a place in .furry and its governance, and which will be deprioritized or cast aside? or will ‘the community’ even have a place or a say in the current and future governance of the TLD—will it instead be, as Jo Freeman might put it, a structure of “the strong [and] the lucky” who happened to move first?

what i am getting at here is that “apolitical” infrastructure and governance is a contradiction in terms. even supposing this was not the case, however, i would still completely reject the notion that either infrastructure or governance can remain “apolitical” when they also serve the role of gatekeeper—when they assume a place in our subculture where their decisions could, would, and in some respects already do exert influence over defining what is and is not subculturally legitimized—like a .furry TLD would and does. the .furry TLD, then, is a result of political choices. how it has structured itself and who it listens to is a political choice. and in fact, consequential political choices about the nature of our subculture—and about what or who we are willing to accept as within its bounds—are not only being made through its structure as we speak, but in some cases have already been made. these decisions, worse, are being made by a handful of actors who seem to not even realize they are effectively making such decisions on our collective behalf.case in point: i, personally, question the value of allowing “entities outside of our community” into the .furry TLD tent when so many of these entities are motivated by (and actively advancing) the very same profit-seeking rentier capitalism that is currently marginalizing our subculture in the first place! might we not be inviting the wolves into our henhouse with a decision like this, in the process subverting many of the benefits of having a TLD for ourselves? and yet it seems the question has already been settled for good: in the future, you or i will exist alongside them (and whatever consequences they bring with them), because the handful of people involved with the .furry TLD intend to allow outside entities on grounds of financial expedience.

more broadly, though, i think we must be incredibly wary of technological projects which—in this internet interregnum at least—fail to realize (much less name or consider) the social and political implications of their work, or the potential consequences of that work. we currently live in an ill-conceived technological regime which did not care to mull such questions—and the harm this (often willful) ignorance has caused in both online and offline spaces is almost impossible to overstate. this is not to imply, of course, that the .furry TLD could ever rise to a level of harm perpetrated by, say, Facebook or Elon Musk; but all the same, just because the .furry TLD is motivated by benevolence does not allow it to simply ignore these questions or avoid preempting their possible harms!individual benevolence, in any case, is no substitute for informed, collective decision-making and accountability; and this is certainly true with respect to speaking for and representing an entire, diverse subculture. if this is actually a project “for furries”—for ‘the community’—and its many interests, then it only seems fair for this asserted community to take an active role in the project's governance and affairs (rather than just retroactively and passively being offered a seat in the building).

i would finally note that in abdicating the level of power described here to a handful of actors who are largely unaccountable, we court future catastrophe and future regret. absent a structure which can be held collectively accountable we lose the ability to, in the words of Jo Freeman, "demand that those who do exercise power and influence be responsible for it"—and time and time again we see the consequences of losing this ability. if FurAffinity, for example, makes a bad editorial decision—as it has many times—there is no serious recourse except hoping something changes at the top. what will remedy our collective enclosure; our commodification; our exploitation is not simply changing who does these things from a non-furry to a furry—no, this can only come when we organize cooperative and democratic institutions, structured around communal participation and accountability and with a clear political vision for achieving and defending our subcultural interests as furries.
1186
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
i think in refining my thoughts on the .furry TLD (essay TBD, hoping to finish it today) i have come to the conclusion that i cannot, in principle, accept any infrastructure of this sort being anything other than democratically administered
020
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
for some reason i didn't do this previously but i'm formulating my previous thoughts on the .furry TLD into an actual essay which lays out the basic problem i foresee with it in more detail
020
Reposted by alyaza ΘΔ
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 30/08/2026
i think the most important thing you can be as a furry is an anti-assimilationist. i think you should be incredibly wary of people who want to "normalize" being a furry—or make it "more respectable" and "presentable" to 'normal' people—and ask who is actually served by, or benefits from, such a move
1227
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
coyote (2)
100
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
the Website League continues to hum along delightfully; we've actually grown quite a bit in the past year or so and, as of the last time we checked, crested over 200 active users (with a total userbase of ~550). we're optimistic the best is yet to come, though :) websiteleague.org/join/
websiteleague.org
Join the Website League!
The Website League: it's like a confederation of independent websites in here.
0102
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
from the earth springs every dragon— because in every scaled heart is desire to return home. to surf the clouds, the skies, the breeze. to part from the earth and dust; to unmistakably be free.
030
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
first order of business when i make it to Canada: we're getting rid of fucking multiple non-transferable vote. this is a disgraceful system of voting which is unbecoming of anything which claims to be a democracy, and anyone who suggests otherwise will be swiftly placed on a bastinado
050
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
now, this may strike some as controversial, but i think if you AI generate food pictures for your restaurant then you should lose all of your customers and go out of business
0156
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
gmod shenanigans with my wife :)
richard nixon pointing a gun in the direction of a camera held by an anthro
094
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Western Massachusetts should invent a queer analogue to big-character posters so we can finally have the long-promised gay Cultural Revolution
050
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
i always cringe internally when i see socialists argue against austerity while failing to make an affirmative case for dramatically increasing the scope and rate of taxation—because in the long term, a socialist society is going to oblige that we all pay significantly more in taxes than we do now
180
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
that Boston Globe article making the rounds is pretty obviously written to be a "point and laugh at the dumb weird queers" article, but it's also just objectively true that most of the behavior it catalogues and describes is antithetical to actually continuing to have a community third space
140
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
i think most queer people get the occasional impulse to open a twee queer-friendly small business, but the thing that queers who actually act on this impulse forget is that (1) being a small business owner sucks; and (2) being a small business owner makes you evil in large part *because* it sucks
3749
Reposted by alyaza ΘΔ
teal @tealightjay.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
loose painty thing testing out gradient maps. i finished a huge commission last week and this was the first Thing i drew after it @whathella.bsky.social
a pink anthro cat with brown hair and green eyes against a faint muted greenish background. he looks towards the viewer.
094
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
this idea is how finding an apartment works (and has worked for at least the past 10 years) and it is one of the worst experiences of all time, benefiting only the most parasitic and evil scumfucks alive because you can make an absurd amount of $ by just doing a race-to-the-bottom rent-seeking scam
0151
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
can you believe that earlier this year i had people sincerely trying to argue to my face that Gavin Newsom is a stalwart defender of trans people and their rights and that i simply Must vote for him if he's the Democratic nominee in 2028, and now he's vetoing layup-level legislation like this
1131
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
they're creating new types of coyote that nobody has ever seen before
041
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
a lot of liberals don't seem to understand that the whole "we're in this together, Vote Blue no matter what" social contract only works if you don't immediately sell an entire group out for shameless electoral opportunist reasons, and once you start doing that its whole point is completely lost
292
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
a good example of this is Co-op City, which is literally the largest housing cooperative in the world. if you're unfamiliar with NYC's politics, you might assume the constituency of this development would be pro-Zohran; but actually, he lost it 75-25 in the primary (and it went 50/50 in the general)
152
alyaza ΘΔ @alyazabirze.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
the discourse nuke we're not ready for is that "transplants" and "gentrifiers" 95% of the time have better politics than the "natives" they "displace" and, consequently, are a historically progressive force that makes it possible to actually win the political changes so many people supposedly want
1100