Sign in

Alan Rozenshtein

@alanrozenshtein.com
19K followers 614 following 1.2K posts

Member of technical staff @anthropic.com. Law professor (on leave) @umnlawschool.bsky.social. Contributing editor @lawfaremedia.org. Former DOJ. alanrozenshtein.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 18/08/2026
A big part of my excitement at this opportunity is based on how how much support I've gotten from my institution and my colleagues (especially our fabulous dean @wmcgeveran.bsky.social). I'm very lucky!
091
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 18/08/2026
Personal update: I've taken leave from @umnlawschool.bsky.social to join @anthropic.com as a member of technical staff researching AI and the rule of law at the Anthropic Institute. Excited to work with @botvinick.bsky.social and the rest of the team!
2184
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 11/08/2026
Excellent. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/202...
theatlantic.com
Why I Quit the Tenure Track
The insufferable hypocrisy of elite academia
221
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 08/08/2026
www.nytimes.com/2026/08/08/o...
nytimes.com
Opinion | A Lot of the Attacks on Higher Ed Are Unfair. Not This One. (Gift Article)
By protecting a star from plagiarism charges, a storied college undermined its values.
162
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 29/06/2026
In Chatrie, the Court did what it should have done in Carpenter: find that there was a Fourth Amendment search but be flexible on what counts as valid predication. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com
Fourth Amendment Reasonableness After Carpenter
In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court held not only that the Fourth Amendment applies when the government collects certain categories of third-party
271
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 24/06/2026
@robertwrighter.bsky.social has written a terrific new book about AI. I got to talk with him about it on @scalinglaws.bsky.social. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/t...
podcasts.apple.com
"The God Test": AI as Cosmic Reckoning, with Robert Wright
Podcast Episode · Scaling Laws · June 23 · 53m
061
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 17/06/2026
Turns out the U.S. did achieve unconditional surrender in the war in Iran...it was just our own surrender, not Iran's. www.nytimes.com/2026/06/17/u...
nytimes.com
A Look at the Text of the Agreement Between the United States and Iran
0115
Reposted by Alan Rozenshtein
Lawfare @lawfaremedia.org · 16/06/2026
"Even if Anthropic persuades the government to lift the control, the deeper question will remain: whether there should be, and if so under what circumstances, a licensing regime for frontier AI," writes @alanrozenshtein.com.
lawfaremedia.org
A Kill Switch for Frontier AI
The government is using export control law to force Anthropic to cut access to its most powerful models. The legal authority is plausible but the facts remain murky.
12714
Reposted by Alan Rozenshtein
Lawfare @lawfaremedia.org · 15/06/2026
On Friday, Anthropic received a letter from the Trump administration ordering the company to suspend all access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models for foreign nationals. @alanrozenshtein.com explains the likely legal authority behind these export controls.
lawfaremedia.org
A Kill Switch for Frontier AI
The government is using export control law to force Anthropic to cut access to its most powerful models. The legal authority is plausible but the facts remain murky.
01810
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 15/06/2026
My latest on the Fable export control order, for @lawfaremedia.org. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/a-ki...
lawfaremedia.org
A Kill Switch for Frontier AI
The government is using export control law to force Anthropic to cut access to its most powerful models. The legal authority is plausible but the facts remain murky.
0126
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 13/06/2026
If the USG’s export controls on Fable continue, it might set up the first big First Amendment case of the AI era.
1124
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 10/06/2026
I'm tired of winning.
2112
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 06/06/2026
The response to this should be fun to watch. www.vanderbilt.edu/principles/s...
vanderbilt.edu
State of Scholarship Report Preface
Special Commission Report on the State of Scholarship in the Humanities and the Humanistic Social Sciences Download the report. This report is addressed to university chancellors and presidents who ar...
020
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 05/06/2026
Excellent line: "Edison said that genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration. But we see perspiration becoming increasingly automated." www.anthropic.com/institute/re...
anthropic.com
When AI builds itself
Our progress toward recursive self-improvement, and its implications.
041
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 04/06/2026
Yikes! www.stephenbainbridge.com/p/the-social...
stephenbainbridge.com
The Social Science Research Network Has Jumped the Shark
Significant and unwelcome changes to what had been legal academia's major open source scholarly repository and notice system
030
Reposted by Alan Rozenshtein
Lawfare @lawfaremedia.org · 26/05/2026
"Voluntary" isn't the floor of frontier AI policy in the Trump WH—it's the ceiling. And even that couldn't survive a few last-minute calls from industry. @kevintfrazier.bsky.social and @alanrozenshtein.com on what was killed in the AI EO and what comes next: www.lawfaremedia.org/article/ai-g...
lawfaremedia.org
AI Governance by Phone Call
An executive order so deferential to the AI industry that it disclaimed any mandatory authority still couldn't survive a few last-minute calls.
02214
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 26/05/2026
On the AI cybersecurity executive order that wasn't, with @kevintfrazier.bsky.social in @lawfaremedia.org. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/ai-g...
lawfaremedia.org
AI Governance by Phone Call
An executive order so deferential to the AI industry that it disclaimed any mandatory authority still couldn't survive a few last-minute calls.
0114
Reposted by Alan Rozenshtein
Roger Parloff @rparloff.bsky.social · 19/05/2026
wow. Judge Henderson of DC Circuit (tho maybe her alone) is not at all buying DoD's "supply chain risk" designation of @anthropic.com . "For the life of me I don't see any evidence of maliciousness ... sabotage ... [or other words in definition]. To me this is just spectacular overreach by the dept"
111520
Reposted by Alan Rozenshtein
Lawfare @lawfaremedia.org · 13/05/2026
Recent reporting suggests that President Trump plans to sign an executive order promoting information sharing between AI labs and the government to identify risks by new models. @kevintfrazier.bsky.social and @alanrozenshtein.com explain the “dominating AI by understanding AI” agenda.
lawfaremedia.org
Dominating AI Requires Understanding AI
AI dominance will require more than faster models—it will require breakthroughs in understanding, testing, and securing frontier AI.
21611
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 12/05/2026
Congrats to @brendanballou.bsky.social for his new book! Excited to read.
031
Reposted by Alan Rozenshtein
Kate Klonick @klonick.bsky.social · 28/04/2026
Almost a year ago, @lawfaremedia.org 's @alanrozenshtein.com and @benjaminwittes.lawfaremedia.org analyzed the nothing-burger 8647 seashell tweet and its worth revisiting: www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-...
lawfaremedia.org
The Situation: And What If He Meant It?
James Comey could have gone a lot stronger than “8647” and still not risked jail.
813752
Reposted by Alan Rozenshtein
Lawfare @lawfaremedia.org · 28/04/2026
Today James Comey was indicted by DOJ for the second time, this time over a social media post of a picture of seashells arranged to say “8647." When it was first posted, @benjaminwittes.lawfaremedia.org and @alanrozenshtein.com explained why the mollusks in question don’t make out a threat.
lawfaremedia.org
The Situation: And What If He Meant It?
James Comey could have gone a lot stronger than “8647” and still not risked jail.
3929282
Reposted by Alan Rozenshtein
Lawfare @lawfaremedia.org · 29/04/2026
Today, we’re launching a 5-week effort to sustain Lawfare’s independent analysis. Lawfare is built on one idea: reliable, expert analysis delivered at the pace of news—without a paywall. That only works because of our supporters. Become a $10/month supporter at lawfaremedia.org/support.
Lawfare logo

Donate Today

www.lawfaremedia.org/support
12214
Reposted by Alan Rozenshtein
Scaling Laws @scalinglaws.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
New episode: @alanrozenshtein.com talks to @jassipannu.bsky.social and Doni Bloomfield about why governing biological data may be the most urgent AI risk policymakers aren't paying enough attention to. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/s...
podcasts.apple.com
Why Data Governance Is the Key to AI Biosecurity, with Jassi Pannu and Doni Bloomfield
Podcast Episode · Scaling Laws · March 24 · 50m
121
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 24/03/2026
Oh wow today's Anthropic hearing is going to be brutal for the government. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
0144
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 22/03/2026
What's the other problem? I thought it was: (1) cheating people out of credit (which is primarily why we care about it for academics) and (2) misrepresenting your abilities (which is why we care about it for students).
101
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 21/03/2026
I think so—and I think within a few years major professional bodies will think so too. You don't get to provide worse service to a client just because you think a technology is icky.
020
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 21/03/2026
Certainly if Anthropic invents the machine god we'll have bigger things to worry about...
110
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 21/03/2026
But that's very different than plagiarism. That's more like when students cheat on exams. But exams exist to test how smart/prepared/knowledgable students are. Legal scholarship exists to be useful. Legal scholars are not like drug-tested athletes—"natural" performance is not the point.
230
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 21/03/2026
Also they shouldn't! It's not remotely like plagiarism. The problem with plagiarism is that you're stealing credit from some other person. But LLMs don't operate in this economy of credit. The problem with using LLMs (if it exsts) is that people might think you're smarter than you "really" are.
210
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 21/03/2026
The detectors seem pretty bad and are extremely fragile with even a small amount of human editing. And they only provide probabilistic detection which is hard to base high stakes decisions on.
120
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 21/03/2026
What part do you think is wrong? My prediction or my normative take?
100
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 21/03/2026
I don’t even thinking they need to be socially accepted, since their spread will be inevitable and it’s very hard to police.
110
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 21/03/2026
Exactly. My view is we should assume that everyone has access to and is potentially using all of these tools and then just decide if we the think the final product is good or not.
010
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 21/03/2026
Ladies and gentlemen, the president of the United States.
0113
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 21/03/2026
I’ve noticed a lot more engagement recently (and as reflected here) in this issue among law professors on this issue. When @kevintfrazier.bsky.social and I wrote our piece about this a year ago we sometimes had to convince people to care. Not anymore. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com
Large Language Scholarship
Generative AI isn’t just coming for the legal academy—the era of what we call “Large Language Scholarship” is already here. Law professors are using AI to write
342
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 21/03/2026
This is the key point. From the other place:
390
Reposted by Alan Rozenshtein
Lawfare @lawfaremedia.org · 19/03/2026
The Pentagon's decision to end its relationship with Anthropic by designating it a supply chain risk bypassed the ordinary procurement system Congress built for contract disputes. The court should push back—by making the Defense Department follow the law, writes @alanrozenshtein.com.
lawfaremedia.org
The Right Remedy in the Anthropic Case
The government can stop buying from Anthropic anytime it wants. It just can't bypass the procurement system Congress built to do it.
310227
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 19/03/2026
In light of the gov's opp. motion in the Anthropic-DOD case, I have a new @lawfaremedia.org piece arguing for a narrow injunction against the supply chain risk designation and Trump's gov-wide order but that allows the gov to cancel individual Ant contracts. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-...
0188
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 18/03/2026
Finally, I don't think the court will need to address the First Amendment argument, but if it does (because it doesn't find Anthropic's statutory arguments convincing) I find it unlikely that it will require the government to use Anthropic just because Trump & Hegseth wrote nasty social media posts.
030
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 18/03/2026
On the other hand, given that, even if the supply chain designations are enjoined, the government can still cancel individual contracts with Anthropic, it's not clear how a PI would harm legitimate the government's national security interests. So that's an argument for the PI. 🤷
121
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 18/03/2026
But there's a separate question of whether Anthropic gets its PI. This could go either way. On the one hand, if the full secondary boycott is off the table, the threat to Anthropic is no longer existential and the court might not grant the PI. 5/6
131
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 18/03/2026
I think they can't because the effect would be to essentially displace the whole complex edifice of procurement law (which elaborately governs individual procurements and contract negotiations)—but for all things government procurement I want to hear what @jtillipman.bsky.social thinks. 4/6
111
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 18/03/2026
...can it go further than that and do a blanket designation based on national security grounds (and same logic for Trump's order regarding more general USG use)? 3/6
111
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 18/03/2026
Ultimately I think the question for the court will be: given that no on seriously contests the government's ability to refuse to purchase Anthropic's services (and probably refuse to allow its contractors to use Claude on specific government projects)... 2/6
121
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 18/03/2026
Here's the government's response to Anthropic's lawsuit. Nothing much new here. www.courtlistener.com/docket/72379... 1/6
154
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 17/03/2026
This was one of the most fun and provocative @scalinglaws.bsky.social conversations I've had in a while!
020
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 13/03/2026
When you've lost John Bolton on war in Iran...
0181
Reposted by Alan Rozenshtein
Roger Parloff @rparloff.bsky.social · 12/03/2026
Want to learn the basics about the 2 laws the govt is using vs Anthropic? My @lawfaremedia.org colleague @alanrozenshtein.com has submitted this amicus brief, which is a terrific primer. He's a prof at @umnlawschool.bsky.social & ex-DOJ Nat Sec Div atty. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
25722
Alan Rozenshtein @alanrozenshtein.com · 12/03/2026
It builds off of this earlier @lawfaremedia.org article. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/pent...
lawfaremedia.org
Pentagon’s Anthropic Designation Won’t Survive First Contact with Legal System
This is designation as political theater: a show of force that will not stick.
031