Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 20/09/2025it’s been abysmal for a while. Made a book publisher pay for a second round of copy editing after they induced weird errors (of the type you both describe) in the page proofs. 010
Reposted by Andrew ReevesAndrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 16/09/2025📢 Call for Proposals: PEPCON 2026 Hoover’s Center for Revitalizing American Institutions is hosting Presidency & Executive Politics Conference on April 16–17, 2026. Deadline: Oct 1, 2025 More info: www.hoover.org/events/presi...hoover.orgPresidency & Executive Politics Conference 063
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 16/09/2025📢 Call for Proposals: PEPCON 2026 Hoover’s Center for Revitalizing American Institutions is hosting Presidency & Executive Politics Conference on April 16–17, 2026. Deadline: Oct 1, 2025 More info: www.hoover.org/events/presi...hoover.orgPresidency & Executive Politics Conference 063
Reposted by Andrew ReevesAndrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 05/07/2025🚨We're hiring at WashU! I'm co-chairing a search for multiple endowed chairs focused on classical liberal principles: rule of law, free markets, regulatory reform, and accountability. Open to tenured scholars across disciplines. Apply by Aug 15: apply.interfolio.com/166960lnkd.inLinkedInThis link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn 27237
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 05/07/2025🚨We're hiring at WashU! I'm co-chairing a search for multiple endowed chairs focused on classical liberal principles: rule of law, free markets, regulatory reform, and accountability. Open to tenured scholars across disciplines. Apply by Aug 15: apply.interfolio.com/166960lnkd.inLinkedInThis link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn 27237
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 24/05/2025In our survey from Feb: Among those with a view, 58% of Republicans say presidents should be able to enact policy without congress. Just 10% of Dems agree. (25% of all respondents neither agree nor disagree) Full breakdown + analysis in my piece @ConversationUS: theconversation.com/trump-treats... 052
Reposted by Andrew ReevesNaomi Schalit @democracyeditor.bsky.social · 21/05/2025Federal judge in Boston says Trump Admin. violated his order barring deportations without adequate notice. Here's @ajreeves.bsky.social on how legal limits alone can’t constrain a defiant president like Trump whose "pace & scale of defiance are w/o precedent" theconversation.com/trump-treats...theconversation.comTrump treats laws as obstacles, not limits − and the only real check on his rule-breaking can come from political pressureThe most meaningful check on presidential power in the Trump era will be political. That’s because courts rely on the broader political system for enforcement. 031
Reposted by Andrew ReevesThe Conversation U.S. @us.theconversation.com · 21/05/202572% of Americans in all oppose unchecked presidential power, but Republican support for unilateral action has hit an all-time high. A political scientist explains how shifting public opinion shapes executive authority: buff.ly/hThJ7a0 @ajreeves.bsky.social, WUSTL and @hooverinstitution.bsky.socialbuff.lyTrump treats laws as obstacles, not limits − and the only real check on his rule-breaking can come from political pressureThe most meaningful check on presidential power in the Trump era will be political. That’s because courts rely on the broader political system for enforcement. 7199
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 21/05/2025My new piece in @us.theconversation.com explores why legal limits alone can’t constrain a defiant president. When Trump treats laws as obstacles, the real check comes from political, not legal, pressure. theconversation.com/trump-treats...theconversation.comTrump treats laws as obstacles, not limits − and the only real check on his rule-breaking can come from political pressureThe most meaningful check on presidential power in the Trump era will be political. That’s because courts rely on the broader political system for enforcement. 02211
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 14/05/2025WashU is hiring for several endowed professorships tied to classical liberalism (rule of law, markets, gov’t accountability). Open across disciplines. Please share or reach out if interested. Full info: apply.interfolio.com/166960apply.interfolio.com Apply - Interfolio {{$ctrl.$state.data.pageTitle}} - Apply - Interfolio 044
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 12/03/2025Had a fantastic (and too brief) time at the @hooverinstitution.bsky.social—catching up with friends, meeting new colleagues, and exploring exciting developments in social science and higher education. Grateful for the engaging conversations! 030
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 27/02/2025It was great to host this group. And a special treat to welcome back Cicero's Jonathan Wolfson (Wash U AB 2005). 020
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 27/02/2025The @weidenbaumcenter.bsky.social hosted a discussion on the shifting labor landscape. 💡 Panelists: 🔹 Rick Barrett (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel) 🔹 Jake Rosenfeld (WashU Sociology) 🔹 Jonathan Wolfson (Cicero Institute) 🎤 Moderator: Pauline Kim (WashU Law) 📺 Watch: www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUeC...youtube.comLabor, Regulation, and the Changing Economy PanelYouTube video by WeidenbaumCenter at WashU 022
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 27/02/2025My colleague, Margit Tavits, is looking to hire a postdoc (supported by @weidenbaumcenter.bsky.social). This is a GREAT opportunity. Learn more and apply at apply.interfolio.com/163623 172
Reposted by Andrew ReevesEnvironmental Politics @environmentalpol.bsky.social · 24/02/2025New article! Rising seas, rising concerns: how climate change vulnerability shapes public opinion, by Tyler Reny, @ajreeves.bsky.social and Dino Christenson. doi.org/10.1080/0964... 1224
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 19/02/2025New publication at Environmental Politics with Reny & Christenson. We find persistent exposure to sea-level rise significantly influences coastal residents' views and actions regarding global warming. Ungated: andrewreeves.org/publication/...; gated: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....andrewreeves.orgRising Seas, Rising Concerns: How Climate Change Vulnerability Shapes Opinions Towards Policy | Andrew ReevesPublic opinion towards human-induced climate change is polarized along partisan lines. Indeed, the preponderance of scholarly work suggests that not even direct experiences with the consequences of cl... 031
Reposted by Andrew ReevesDavid Ryan Miller @davidryanmiller.com · 16/02/2025Prepping for class tomorrow and stumbled upon this prescient passage from Doug Kriner and @ajreeves.bsky.social's 2015 book, The Particularistic President: 1153
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 13/02/2025I had the privilege of speaking with @daschloz.bsky.social and @samrosenfeld.bsky.social about their fantastic book, The Hollow Parties. Grateful for the conversation and their insights. Another great @weidenbaumcenter.bsky.social event! 172
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 08/02/202557% of Republicans cannot say that Trump's executive orders have been legal or constitutional. 0114
Reposted by Andrew ReevesDavid Ryan Miller @davidryanmiller.com · 31/01/2025Interesting study that draws contrasts with @ajreeves.bsky.social and I's work on taking/deflecting responsibility for governmental crises We found the public rewards accepting blame, while this @bjpols.bsky.social finds it punishes apologies for personal misdeeds www.cambridge.org/core/journal... 042
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 24/01/2025Are female politicians better advocates for their districts? Featuring research by my colleague Jaclyn Kaslovsky (published in the AJPS with Pamela Ban) source.washu.edu/2025/01/fema...source.washu.eduAre female politicians better advocates for their districts?Research from the Department of Political Science at Washington University in St. Louis found that women in the U.S. House of Representatives are more likely to emphasize their home districts. 120
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 24/01/2025If you are trying to make sense of American politics today, you should come to this very timely talk with Danny Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld on Feb 6. Their book is a penetrating look at the dysfunction of American political parties and how it came to be. wc.wustl.edu/rsvp-februar... 020
Reposted by Andrew ReevesBen Noble @benjaminsnoble.bsky.social · 18/10/2023Definitely bad for accountability, but probably helpful to Republicans. My research with @stevenwwebster.bsky.social and @ajreeves.bsky.social finds white Americans decrease approval of Dem. presidents more than Rep. presidents when they are worried about crime. academic.oup.com/poq/article/... 1125
Reposted by Andrew ReevesBrendan Nyhan @brendannyhan.bsky.social · 23/09/2023How has legislative attention to race changed over time? Dramatic growth in racialized words in legislation, but concentrated in symbolic resolutions, not substantive bills drive.google.com/file/d/11WPw... - new JMP from Amber Mackey (on poli sci market from Penn, MIT predoc) 12514
Andrew Reeves @ajreeves.bsky.social · 22/08/2023A fictional character you would give an invite code to. 020