iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Adriana F. Chávez De la Peña

@adrifelcha.bsky.social

Ph.D. in Cognitive Sciences (UCI 💙💛) M.S. in Statistics (UCI 💙💛) B.A. in Psychology (UNAM 🇲🇽❤️) —— De Iztapalapa para el mundo ✨

Posts Replies Media

Adriana F. Chávez De la Peña @adrifelcha.bsky.social · 21/11/2025

I forgot to do the thing where I announce my póster before the Póster session!! 🫣 Anyway, here is a copy for posterity! :-) Shoutout to Eunice Shin (not on BlueSky) and the great @joachim.cidlab.com !!

091

Adriana F. Chávez De la Peña @adrifelcha.bsky.social · 16/11/2025

Go, check Ari’s work!! ✨

030

Reposted by Adriana F. Chávez De la Peña

Joachim Vandekerckhove 🏖️ @joachim.cidlab.com · 27/07/2025

Now with different formatting!

link.springer.com

An EZ Bayesian hierarchical drift diffusion model for response time and accuracy

082

Adriana F. Chávez De la Peña @adrifelcha.bsky.social · 14/11/2025

Also very happy to share this very [short but also very] cool piece we worked with Eunice Shin, who joined the lab at the end of her undergraduate studies ✨✨

031

Reposted by Adriana F. Chávez De la Peña

Joachim Vandekerckhove 🏖️ @joachim.cidlab.com · 17/10/2025

This fun little preprint covers an experiment in my lab that was done 10 years ago. The topic was suggested by the first author, who was then a student in my undergraduate methods class. She wanted to conduct a test of a diagnostic procedure, "manual muscle testing" (MMT) that was used by 1/

161

Reposted by Adriana F. Chávez De la Peña

Joachim Vandekerckhove 🏖️ @joachim.cidlab.com · 13/11/2025

UCI did a little piece on the journey of my graduate student, Kath. It's a nice read! Also includes my favorite lab group photo 🤩

081

Adriana F. Chávez De la Peña @adrifelcha.bsky.social · 14/11/2025

Back to Bluesky to share this piece about Kath!! She is so cool! 🎉

060

Adriana F. Chávez De la Peña @adrifelcha.bsky.social · 18/01/2024

😁❗❗

151

Reposted by Adriana F. Chávez De la Peña

PsyArXivBot @psyarxivbot.bsky.social · 07/12/2023

The HDI+ROPE decision rule is logically incoherent but we can fix it: osf.io/5p2qt

043