Sign in

0x4e5253.bsky.social

@0x4e5253.bsky.social
17 followers 209 following 7 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
0x4e5253.bsky.social @0x4e5253.bsky.social · 16/04/2025
My concern is the executive branch runs the jails. If they don’t respect court orders, why do they obey an order to keep someone locked up if they don’t have a problem with what that person did
010
0x4e5253.bsky.social @0x4e5253.bsky.social · 25/12/2024
Thank you very much! I am 100% outside your practice area but will work you into a client alert
120
0x4e5253.bsky.social @0x4e5253.bsky.social · 24/12/2024
This is a great tidbit. Do you happen to have a cite offhand? I would love to be able to reference this. If it’s in one of your papers lmk and I’ll try to cite that also
020
0x4e5253.bsky.social @0x4e5253.bsky.social · 23/11/2024
see, e.g., @jdmortenson.bsky.social's work and the other side just sort of pretending it doesn't exist
010
0x4e5253.bsky.social @0x4e5253.bsky.social · 23/11/2024
Right. She may have asked for an early exam in an attempt to make clear that she wasn't trying to game the system -- she'd have LESS time to study than her peers, so any unfairness would be borne by her. She may not have asked for a late exam bc she perceived that as less likely to be granted
030
0x4e5253.bsky.social @0x4e5253.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
I think companies would prefer not to defend on those grounds because that would involve an admission that the choice not to advertise on twitter was ideologically motivated 2/2
100
0x4e5253.bsky.social @0x4e5253.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
he's threatening an antitrust lawsuit, which is not the classical sort of SLAPP suit. While the illegal boycott he alleges is occurring could be characterized as the type of expressive conduct that would be covered by an anti-SLAPP statute 1/2
100