iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Joyce White Vance @joycewhitevance.bsky.social · 24/02/2025

you know what they say. if it walks like a nazi, talks like a nazi, looks like a nazi, and salutes like a nazi...

000 0

Reposted by oats

The President of the United States expressing his views on the 1st Amendment

4147160524100 0

i always find it funny when fat, lazy americans go against basic biology and common medical knowledge to convince themselves they're healthy.

000 0

any scapegoat that'll take the attention away from the billionaire nazis taking money away from child cancer patients, eh?

100 0

no, no, i agree, trust the nazi billionaires. it's actually the charities and the families that rely on them that are the sick criminals!

110 0

wow! guess that really affected your critical thinking, with you voting for the billionaires who cut coverage and consumer protections for people with pre-existing conditions. get better soon, nazi bootlicker. ♥️

000 0

oh, so we're not just cutting funding to child cancer patients, we're calling them liars! i would expect nothing less from the nazi party of family values.

100 0

oh, are we playing the "invasive questions asked as a deflection" game? how many times have you survived cancer, and what chronic conditions and disabilities were you born with?

000 0

these families are suffering because they live in a country without universal healthcare that's ruled by nazi billionaires who will strip them of what little charity funding they receive. trust me, the last thing cancer patients want is less regulations.

010 0

so you went from "this is false" to "well it's true, but those kids deserved it."

110 0

we have to cut funding for the child cancer patients so we can fund child cancer patients !(which we won't actually do)

110 0

people: musk is taking funding away from child cancer patients magats: but hunder bidem!!!1!!

020 0

what a shitty thing to say about struggling families. you can always count on the magats to work against the people.

020 0

firstfocus.org/resource/tar...

210 0

"holding men accountable is gay"

100 0

you're not the sharpest spoon in the drawer

000 0

we both know you won't.

010 0

oregon and Washington have high vaccination rates, which is why they're not in deep shit like Texas. :)

000 0

Fred Wellman @fpwellman.bsky.social · 22/02/2025

is anyone surprised that the trump supporter got upset over men being held responsible?

100 0

Reposted by oats

Last night's Pentagon massacre is much more than realized. Not just firing the black CJCS and first woman CNO but all the senior JAG officers and hiring a man who just joined 3 different crypto firms tied to Kushner and Thiel as Chairman. I did a deep dive into it open.substack.com/pub/fpwellma...

open.substack.com

This is the most dangerous move yet

The canary is gasping for air

12133262114519 0

in the US, retard is a slur and the people who use it are typically on the same side as the worm-brained nazis.

000 0

americans will blame their obesity on everyone but themselves.

010 0

Our Eyes are Open @thecookout.bsky.social · 22/02/2025

taking pain meds without pain is inherently bad and going on steroids without corresponding hormones issues is also inherently bad.

100 0

Reposted by oats

This is not good for America. A draft dodger is punking Generals who fought and sacrificed for this nation. THIS IS HOW WE REPAY THEM? It’s time for: SUSTAINED BOYCOTTS of businesses that stand with Trump. VOTE OUT ALL REPUBLICANS IN LOCAL, state and midterm election. CLEAN TGE HOUSE.

25831 0

"reality" is whatever you see on kremlin news, eh? 🤣

000 0

what's so hard to understand? conservatives have to share their platforms with nazis and pedos in order to feel safe. anytime a nazi or pedo gets blocked, they start whining about echo chambers.

120 0

not wanting to have a baby is enough reason not to have a baby. women shouldn't need a "right reason" to avoid being forced to have men's babies.

100 0

Wendy Williams, the notorious liar whose career revolves around controversy? the same attention whore who drank herself into a stupor? you're really just proving my point. abortions are expensive, painful, and incredibly hard to get. no one is using them as birth control.

000 0

again, this just supports my point. according to your cult, you can safely violate children as long as they are not "pre-menstrual females."

000 0

so islam supports pedophilia as long as the children being violated are pubescent. am I wrong? is the "age of maturity" in your cult not determined by puberty?

000 0

laughing about violating consent again?? do you do anything else?

100 0

yes, you sleep like a baby violating women's consent and forcing them into non-consensual reproductive acts, don't ya?

100 0

yes, you find the violation of women's consent very funny, we get it.

000 0

so the correct answer was "you just don't want to acknowledge that truth because it doesn't paint your rhetoric in a good light."

000 0

every. single. time. we get to the concept of consent you back out of the argument. it's because you know that your rhetoric relied on the violation of women's consent. we haven't "talked enough," you've avoided the question enough.

000 0

no healthcare should be illegal. it should be up to the patient and the doctor as to whether or not a procedure is considered necessary. I know you hate to hear that, but women deserve to have their consent respected and doctors deserve to have their knowledge respected.

000 0

Europe is a collection of dozens of countries with different laws and regulations and the idea of a "european model" is inane and inaccurate. but considering your answer wasn't just, "yes," we can determine that your ideology still involves violating the consent of women.

000 0

that's wrong? so you support women being able to get abortions, even when their life isn't at stake?

100 0

later term abortions are less than 1% of all abortions, and they're only done in life or death situations, aka miscarriages. you focus on such a tiny percentage of abortions, because your ideology revolves around dishonesty.

100 0

so are you denying that these abortion laws are forcing women to give birth to children they do not want? or do you just not want to acknowledge that truth because it doesn't paint your rhetoric in a good light?

100 0

but you're okay with violating women's consent and forcing them to have men's babies. please try to retain this point.

100 0

decades ago, we also thought that women were household objects. it makes sense that you're viewing this from the perspective of people living in an era where women weren't considered equal. fetuses do not feel in the womb, they are unconscious.

100 0

these aren't "later term abortions," they are miscarriages, and they're extremely rare. the fetuses are not babies. your ideology revolves around dishonesty and misinformation.

100 0

and I obviously noticed that you manage to make up some lame copout every time I point out that your rhetoric inherently requires violating women's consent and forcing them to have babies. why is that?

100 0

yet when it comes to fetuses, suddenly you forced-birthers are all for forcing people to give up their lives and bodies and consent for the sake of the "life" of a fetus. it's not about saving lives, its about controlling women. (2)

100 0