iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Replies

abadidea @0xabad1dea.infosec.exchange.ap.brid.gy · 08/10/2025

jetbrains is far from the first company to make this particular pair of claims but it is simply, on the most fundamental level, impossible to mass-collect people’s terminal and editor contents and also not collect sensitive or personal data. I realize they […] [Original post on infosec.exchange]

screenshot: We’re now adding the option to allow the collection of detailed code‑related data pertaining to IDE activity, such as edit history, terminal usage, and your interactions with AI features. This may include code snippets, prompt text, and AI responses.

That sounds like a lot, and it is, but that’s where the real value for improvements comes from. If you allow us to collect this data, we will make sure that:
No sensitive or personal information is shared.

(Snippets of the text have been highlighted: “edit history, terminal usage, code snippets, prompt text … no sensitive or personal information is shared.”

1036

dgelessus @dgelessus.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy · 08/10/2025

@0xabad1dea I particularly "like" their FAQ entry on the subject: > How do you **prevent** sensitive data from being used to train models? > > We use filtering, anonymization, and strict access controls to **avoid** using sensitive information for LLM training. [...] Emphasis mine. How do they […]

mastodon.social

Original post on mastodon.social

114