↪ Replying to @ecowarriorss.bsky.social
Strict liability just turns into an insurance moat that only the tech giants can afford. It makes way more sense to pin liability on whoever actually decided to wire the model into a high-risk workflow.
Strict liability is a legal doctrine in which a company or person is held responsible for causing harm irrespective of any negligence or any intention, or even if they tried to stop the harm or attack
AI companies should be held strictly liable
fortune.com/2026/10/13/s...
fortune.com
Strict liability is gaining traction as an idea for forcing AI companies to get serious about safety | Fortune
But strict liability might not work, could curtail open source AI development, and might push AI companies to move into their customers' turf.