"Cardinal essentially sabotaged their goal of developing a protocol that “controlled for variables that could threaten the study’s validity” by giving facilitators & the people documenting the facilitated messages (called recorders) in the study access to the word list being used for test stimuli."
@fcisnotscience.bsky.socialDoes Cardinal, Hanson, and Wakeham's 1996 Study Prove Authorship in FC - Part 4 (Facilitator Behaviors)
www.facilitatedcommunication.org/blog/does-ca...
facilitatedcommunication.org
Does Cardinal, Hanson, and Wakeham’s 1996 Study Prove Authorship in FC? Part 4 (Facilitator Behaviors) — Facilitated Communication
Today’s blog post is the fourth in a series featuring a 1996 article titled “Investigation of authorship in facilitated communication.” This is one of the top studies that proponents include on pro-FC...