Corey Rayburn Yung @coreyryung.bsky.social · 21/01/2026The other significant SCOTUS case relevant to ICE arrests is Abel v. United States, 362 U.S. 217 (1960). But it involved a hotel room (not a home) and was well before the modern Payton rule developed. 1100
Corey Rayburn Yung @coreyryung.bsky.social · 21/01/2026Thanks to @benblumoehr.bsky.social and @reichlinmelnick.bsky.social, here is the memo. At least based on this portion, ICE isn't engaged in anything resembling legal analysis. It's just declaring its conclusion that is contrary to SCOTUS precedent. bsky.app/profile/reic...Aaron Reichlin-Melnick@reichlinmelnick.bsky.socialICE secretly told its officers that any time someone has been ordered removed, ICE can break down their door. It has been accepted for generations that the only thing which can authorize agents to break into your home is a warrant signed by a judge. No wonder ICE hid this memo! 29027
Corey Rayburn Yung @coreyryung.bsky.social · 21/01/2026And thanks to @amwclark.bsky.social, here is the entire memo. bsky.app/profile/amwc...Anne-Marie W. Clark 👩👧👦🐶⚖️😷🌎🚢📚🌦️⚜️@amwclark.bsky.socialThe ICE memo itself starts on p. 17 of this ⤵️ www.documentcloud.org/documents/26... (The memo in the image is *about* the ICE memo. The ICE memo is then an exhibit below it.)documentcloud.orgDHS ICE memo 1-21-26 1102
Eating my feelings. 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇮🇱 @sushiforlunch.bsky.social · 21/01/2026But they’re using an admin warrant to break down doors of not only residents who have not received a final order of removal, but as of yesterday on US citizens. How is this not being litigated already? 120
@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
