i love the respect Hoover gives to Kiros. at on point Hoover even jokes "i agree even though I'm a republican"
Hoover brings up Israel and then immediately zoom into point 2 from this thread and Kiros gives a respectful response supporting a secular israel that gets $0 from the US
i recently realized "anti-zionist" is not well defined
the three main positions on zionism:
1.) israel should exist and should be a jewish state
2.) israel can exist and should be a aecular democracy
3.) israel should be destroyed
point 3 is unambiguously antizionist
but what about point 2??