ME/CFS Science @mecfsscience.org · 16/12/20242) It was Cochrane itself that came up with the initiative of writing an entirely new review with a new protocol, author group, an advisory panel, etc. 1170
ME/CFS Science @mecfsscience.org · 16/12/20243) The reasoning was that the old review was indeed flawed but that only so much of it can be corrected because of the outdated protocol it was based on. So a new protocol and review would be the solution. Here's how they announced this in 2019: 1170
ME/CFS Science @mecfsscience.org · 16/12/20244) Now, more than 5 years later, Cochrane decided to reject the new protocol and stop the new review because it is not a priority and there is insufficient new research. Source: www.s4me.info/threads/peti... 1160
