Interesting approach: Suppress Josef's comment, then suppress anyone else that isn't in support of the new "governance."
Making a deal with the person that broke the last deal is futile, but what do you achieve by suppressing the people saying that?
Suppression just brings more attention.
@martinemde.comJosef summed up problem of any new governance of rubygems in this comment:
“The original governance was not the problem… The real failure was that one maintainer ignored it, and Ruby Core accepted that violation”
github.com/ruby/rubygem...
github.com
Initial `ruby/rubygems` governance doc by schneems · Pull Request #9187 · ruby/rubygems
This provides a starting point for a Governance doc. It attempts to:
Document the current state of norms with regard to Matz and Ruby core.
Present a well-defined boundary between Ruby Central (RC...