"Hunter Biden was on a board in Ukraine" was enough to whatabout away Trump family corruption
And "Twitter made exceptions for Trump but got a request from a Dem they rejected" was enough to "prove" bias *against* the right
So "Smith was in Georgia, where Fanny Willis is" should've been enough too
Also, what was the alleged link between the Hawks game and Willis? Was she there?? Or was the allegation that he went to see a game in Atlanta so it must have been a secret meeting with Willis? I’m so confused on the evidentiary logic