Andrew D Wilson @adw.bsky.social · 28/11/2024What’s your take on Gibson’s analysis of this problem (Chap 5 and 11 of the 1979 book)? He engages with the informational basic of this perception in terms of how occlusion works in the optiyc array, for example 110 1
Jonathan Mitchell @mitchellphilosophy.bsky.social · 28/11/2024I'm not that familiar with Gibson's response, although there are aspects of his 'ecological view' that as present (earlier) in Husserl and in Alva Noe. The idea is roughly that patterns of 'kinaesthesis' (forms of bodily awareness) are essential to 'the sense of presence' of perceptual objects. 110 1
Jonathan Mitchell @mitchellphilosophy.bsky.social · 28/11/2024I'd also probably think that Gibson's account wouldn't be pitched a solution specifically to the phenomenological problem/puzzle I'm interested in and he's more concerned with a question concerning the construction of '3 dimensional form' at the level of the visual system. 110 1
