iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Open on Bluesky →

Jody Howard @thegospelplow.com · 29/11/2024

Worth sharing this article from 2016 given the first offensive in over four years by the Syrian opposition:

The conflicts unfolding in the Middle East today, then, are not really about the legitimacy of borders or the validity of places called Syria, Iraq, or Libya. Instead, the origin of the struggles within these countries is over who has the right to rule them. The Syrian conflict, regardless of what it has evolved into today, began as an uprising by all manner of Syrians — men and women, young and old, Sunni, Shiite, Kurdish, and even Alawite — against an unfair and corrupt autocrat, just as Libyans, Egyptians, Tunisians, Yemenis, and Bahrainis did in 2010 and 2011.

The weaknesses and contradictions of authoritarian regimes are at the heart of the Middle East’s ongoing tribulations. Even the rampant ethnic and religious sectarianism is a result of this authoritarianism, which has come to define the Middle East’s state system far more than the Sykes-Picot agreement ever did.

Jody Howard@thegospelplow.com

"The region’s “unnatural” borders did not lead to the Middle East’s ethnic and religious divisions. The ones to... http://fb.me/4EzhmvRQ9

Don’t Blame Sykes-Picot for the Middle East’s Mess

The focus on the century-old accord is a product of bad h...

000