Boxo McFoxo @boxobark.ing · 09/10/2026OpenAI's Navier-Stokes proof requires the Planck length to not be a thing if the force described in it were to ever exist in physical reality. The Navier-Stokes equations are a model of fluid dynamics. 33510
pettter, stuff scientist @pettter.bsky.social · 09/10/2026...what are you even talking about here? 200
Boxo McFoxo @boxobark.ing · 09/10/2026There are basically three reasons to break the laws of physics for a proof like this: 1. Applied mathematicians will sometimes disregard physics in order to make an intractable problem computable, but they will only do this if the physics being disregarded are negligible in the applied context. 191
Windy @windyspirals.bsky.social · 09/10/2026As a chemist I found the whole thing kind of unimpressive. "Oh you found a circumstance where a mathematical model that doesn't account for every possible variable breaks down? How amazing!!! 110
