romestamo.bsky.social @romestamo.bsky.social · 28/06/2026Nothing I’ve said relies on conspiracy — it’s based on publicly available reporting, parliamentary statements, and the Home Office’s own wording. If you think any specific point is wrong, challenge that point, not my motives. 200 0
romestamo.bsky.social @romestamo.bsky.social · 28/06/2026The fact that the government chose to apply the Terrorism Act doesn’t make the label automatically correct. Governments have misapplied terrorism legislation before — that’s why legal scholars, human rights groups, and even former counter‑terror officials criticised the proscription. 210 0
lazytitan258.bsky.social @lazytitan258.bsky.social · 28/06/2026However, the courts found it was valid. I’m guessing you wouldn’t question the court’s decision had they found it unlawful. That’s called ideology. 000 0
romestamo.bsky.social @romestamo.bsky.social · 28/06/2026You’re repeating the government’s PR line. The reality is: components, dual‑use items, and military‑adjacent technology are still being exported. You can call them “not what most people consider arms”, but they’re still part of weapons systems. 100 0
