iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Replies

Brian Fishman @brianfishman1.bsky.social · 20/06/2025

The broader context here matters. Society writ large. Has not yet established who is ultimately responsible for mitigating different types of AI risk. Foundation model developers are offering an answer - that largely (but not completely) focuses on catastrophic risks. 1/n

Wesley Morgan@wesleymorgan.bsky.social

Always comforting to hear that tech executives are thinking about how they might use their products to combat the deadly problems they foresee their products creating www.axios.com/2025/06/18/o...

axios.com

OpenAI preps for models with higher bioweapons risk

Preventing harm means both the company, and society at large, need to be prepared.

100

Brian Fishman @brianfishman1.bsky.social · 20/06/2025

This will push more responsibility on app developers to manage lesser (but more common and still highly problematic) risks. It’s fair to say that foundation model companies see this as financially useful, but that doesn’t mean it’s necessarily wrong. 2/n

100

Brian Fishman @brianfishman1.bsky.social · 20/06/2025

It’s not the cost of content moderation that they worry about most; it’s about honing a model that’s unlikely to produce harm but that is still applicable to a wide range of usecases. Might sound easy, but it isn’t. So you see companies focusing on catastrophic risks, like bioweapons. 3/n

100