Was Starmer fulfilling the platform his party was elected on?
No.
Was he then putting country above party and pursuing electorally painful but necessary reforms?
No.
Was he then charismatic and standing on principle?
No.
Did he then run an ethical and trustworthy govt?
Also no.
Not really. Starmer pursued a strategy that made essentially every political scientist suck their teeth and go 'that's not a good idea', his administration was not centrist (looking Tony Blair when I take my glasses off does not make you centrist)....I don't think polsci will be that troubled.